Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significantly lower » significantly higher (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significantly lower » significantly higher (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
-
4001
-
4002
-
4003
Mode separation results of different methods in Qingdao shallow sea waveguide conditions.
Published 2025Subjects: -
4004
-
4005
Leaves of the <i>atb’’αβγδ</i> plants under brushing-induced mechanical stress conditions.
Published 2024Subjects: -
4006
-
4007
-
4008
Results of different Warping transform corrections for negative sound velocity gradient profiles.
Published 2025Subjects: -
4009
Mode separation results of different methods in Qingdao shallow sea waveguide conditions.
Published 2025Subjects: -
4010
-
4011
-
4012
-
4013
-
4014
NK cell frequencies in the colon and spleen of mice with FMT from people with intestinal protists.
Published 2024Subjects: -
4015
-
4016
-
4017
-
4018
Changes in the neutrophil count.
Published 2025“…The rate of delayed chemotherapy in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (2.3% vs. 29.5%), P = 0.001; the rate of interruption of radiotherapy in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (2.3% vs.27.3%), P = 0.003; 4. …”
-
4019
Changes in the platelet count.
Published 2025“…The rate of delayed chemotherapy in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (2.3% vs. 29.5%), P = 0.001; the rate of interruption of radiotherapy in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (2.3% vs.27.3%), P = 0.003; 4. …”
-
4020
Changes in the white blood cell count.
Published 2025“…The rate of delayed chemotherapy in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (2.3% vs. 29.5%), P = 0.001; the rate of interruption of radiotherapy in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (2.3% vs.27.3%), P = 0.003; 4. …”