Search alternatives:
significantly lower » significantly higher (Expand Search)
linked decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
significantly lower » significantly higher (Expand Search)
linked decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
-
3021
Table 2_Dietary retinoic acid improved the growth, lipid metabolism and immune status in Macrobrachium rosenbergii.docx
Published 2025“…Compared to the prawns fed 4 mg/kg dietary RA, there was significantly lower lipid deposition in the muscle, hepatopancreas and whole body of prawns fed 296 mg/kg dietary RA. …”
-
3022
Table 1_Examining the mediating function of SIRI in the association between LC9 and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.docx
Published 2025“…When multiple covariates were taken into account, logistic regression analysis showed that a 28% decrease in the prevalence of COPD was linked to every 10-point increase in LC9 (OR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.67, 0.77), while a 1.17-fold increase in the prevalence of COPD was linked to each unit increase in SIRI (OR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.10, 1.25). …”
-
3023
Data Sheet 1_Association of dietary index for gut microbiota and cardiovascular diseases in American adults: evidence from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999–201...
Published 2025“…Compared to participants with DI-GM scores of 0–3, those with DI-GM ≥6 had significantly lower CVD risk (OR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.71–0.94). …”
-
3024
Table 1_Cutaneous sensory symptoms and emotional regulation in non-clinical healthy students: a near-infrared spectroscopy study.docx
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>Participants with higher cutaneous symptoms struggled more with maintaining attention during SART and showed less reduction in unpleasant emotions. Only those with lower symptoms experienced a decrease in unpleasant emotions. …”
-
3025
Table2_Cuproptosis-related lncRNAs emerge as a novel signature for predicting prognosis in prostate carcinoma and functional experimental validation.docx
Published 2024“…SNHG9 knockdown resulted in a significant increase in G1 phase cells and a decrease in S and G2 phases, indicating inhibition of DNA synthesis and cell cycle progression. …”
-
3026
Table1_Cuproptosis-related lncRNAs emerge as a novel signature for predicting prognosis in prostate carcinoma and functional experimental validation.docx
Published 2024“…SNHG9 knockdown resulted in a significant increase in G1 phase cells and a decrease in S and G2 phases, indicating inhibition of DNA synthesis and cell cycle progression. …”
-
3027
Table2_Causal relationship between antihypertensive drugs and Hashimoto’s thyroiditis: a drug-target Mendelian randomization study.xlsx
Published 2024“…Moreover, genetically mimicking the use of loop diuretics (OR [95% CI]: 0.94 [0.91, 0.97]; p = 3.57×10<sup>-5</sup>) and thiazide diuretics (0.98 [0.96, 0.99]; p = 3.83×10<sup>-3</sup>) showed a significant association with a decreased risk of HT only in European population. …”
-
3028
Image1_Causal relationship between antihypertensive drugs and Hashimoto’s thyroiditis: a drug-target Mendelian randomization study.tif
Published 2024“…Moreover, genetically mimicking the use of loop diuretics (OR [95% CI]: 0.94 [0.91, 0.97]; p = 3.57×10<sup>-5</sup>) and thiazide diuretics (0.98 [0.96, 0.99]; p = 3.83×10<sup>-3</sup>) showed a significant association with a decreased risk of HT only in European population. …”
-
3029
Table4_Causal relationship between antihypertensive drugs and Hashimoto’s thyroiditis: a drug-target Mendelian randomization study.xlsx
Published 2024“…Moreover, genetically mimicking the use of loop diuretics (OR [95% CI]: 0.94 [0.91, 0.97]; p = 3.57×10<sup>-5</sup>) and thiazide diuretics (0.98 [0.96, 0.99]; p = 3.83×10<sup>-3</sup>) showed a significant association with a decreased risk of HT only in European population. …”
-
3030
Table5_Causal relationship between antihypertensive drugs and Hashimoto’s thyroiditis: a drug-target Mendelian randomization study.xlsx
Published 2024“…Moreover, genetically mimicking the use of loop diuretics (OR [95% CI]: 0.94 [0.91, 0.97]; p = 3.57×10<sup>-5</sup>) and thiazide diuretics (0.98 [0.96, 0.99]; p = 3.83×10<sup>-3</sup>) showed a significant association with a decreased risk of HT only in European population. …”
-
3031
Image2_Causal relationship between antihypertensive drugs and Hashimoto’s thyroiditis: a drug-target Mendelian randomization study.tif
Published 2024“…Moreover, genetically mimicking the use of loop diuretics (OR [95% CI]: 0.94 [0.91, 0.97]; p = 3.57×10<sup>-5</sup>) and thiazide diuretics (0.98 [0.96, 0.99]; p = 3.83×10<sup>-3</sup>) showed a significant association with a decreased risk of HT only in European population. …”
-
3032
Table1_Causal relationship between antihypertensive drugs and Hashimoto’s thyroiditis: a drug-target Mendelian randomization study.xlsx
Published 2024“…Moreover, genetically mimicking the use of loop diuretics (OR [95% CI]: 0.94 [0.91, 0.97]; p = 3.57×10<sup>-5</sup>) and thiazide diuretics (0.98 [0.96, 0.99]; p = 3.83×10<sup>-3</sup>) showed a significant association with a decreased risk of HT only in European population. …”
-
3033
Table3_Causal relationship between antihypertensive drugs and Hashimoto’s thyroiditis: a drug-target Mendelian randomization study.xlsx
Published 2024“…Moreover, genetically mimicking the use of loop diuretics (OR [95% CI]: 0.94 [0.91, 0.97]; p = 3.57×10<sup>-5</sup>) and thiazide diuretics (0.98 [0.96, 0.99]; p = 3.83×10<sup>-3</sup>) showed a significant association with a decreased risk of HT only in European population. …”
-
3034
Image 5_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.png
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
3035
Image 9_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
3036
Image 1_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.jpeg
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
3037
Image 2_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
3038
Image 8_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
3039
Image 7_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”
-
3040
Image 10_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
Published 2025“…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …”