Showing 1,761 - 1,780 results of 4,664 for search '(( significantly lower decrease ) OR ( significantly ((weaker decrease) OR (greater decrease)) ))', query time: 0.47s Refine Results
  1. 1761

    The results of endogenous analysis. by Tiantian Dong (6247917)

    Published 2024
    “…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
  2. 1762

    Correlation test. by Tiantian Dong (6247917)

    Published 2024
    “…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
  3. 1763

    S1 Dataset - by Tiantian Dong (6247917)

    Published 2024
    “…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
  4. 1764

    The mediation of confidence. by Tiantian Dong (6247917)

    Published 2024
    “…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
  5. 1765

    Robustness test. by Tiantian Dong (6247917)

    Published 2024
    “…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
  6. 1766

    The effects of consumption inequality on SWB. by Tiantian Dong (6247917)

    Published 2024
    “…The findings indicate that consumption inequality has a significant negative impact on SWB. Specifically, for every unit increase in consumption inequality, the probability of individuals rating their SWB as “Happy” and “Very happy” decreases by 0.37% and 5.45% respectively. …”
  7. 1767
  8. 1768
  9. 1769
  10. 1770
  11. 1771

    Functional and strength parameters. by Susanne S. Rauh (21192252)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Methods</p><p>Bilateral quantitative MRI of the lower limbs was performed in individuals with LGMD-R9 and healthy controls. …”
  12. 1772

    Baseline characteristics. by Neng Pan (5262032)

    Published 2025
    “…However, the body fat mass (BFM) and body mass index (BMI) decreased significantly in the ST group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.005, respectively). …”
  13. 1773

    Data ste. by Neng Pan (5262032)

    Published 2025
    “…However, the body fat mass (BFM) and body mass index (BMI) decreased significantly in the ST group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.005, respectively). …”
  14. 1774

    Comparison of post-experimental outcome measures. by Neng Pan (5262032)

    Published 2025
    “…However, the body fat mass (BFM) and body mass index (BMI) decreased significantly in the ST group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.005, respectively). …”
  15. 1775
  16. 1776
  17. 1777
  18. 1778

    S1 File - by Kathleen Kristensen (17525457)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>Participants had significantly lower odds (AOR = 0.28; 95% CI 0.12–0.65) of reporting difficulty in accessing syringes later in the pandemic. …”
  19. 1779

    Chicago COVID-19 mitigation policy timeline. by Kathleen Kristensen (17525457)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>Participants had significantly lower odds (AOR = 0.28; 95% CI 0.12–0.65) of reporting difficulty in accessing syringes later in the pandemic. …”
  20. 1780

    Demographic and ocular features. by Mingxi Shao (10066570)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>In the PCG group, H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and MDA levels were notably higher than in controls (p < 0.001, <i><i>p</i> </i>= 0.020), while TAS levels were significantly lower (p = 0.043). Adjusting for age and gender, the serum TAS (OR = 0.07, 95% CI 0.01–0.85, <i><i>p</i></i> = 0.037), H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> (OR = 1.21, 95% CI 1.09–1.35, <i><i>p</i></i> = 0.001) and MDA (OR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.00–1.34, <i><i>p</i></i> = 0.034) were determined to be independent risk/protective factors for PCG. …”