Patients’ responses to EQ5-D items. by Walid Al-Qerem (3760027)

“…Additionally, higher JDHLQ scores were significantly associated with higher EQ5-D scores (0.012, 95% CI (0.006–0.018), p<0.001). …”

Statistically Significant Results for Heart Rate Variability (HRV) Indices for High and Low Authority Groups. by David Vagni (8060432)

Subjects:

Statistically Significant Results for Heart Rate Variability (HRV) Indices for High and Low Clarity Groups. by David Vagni (8060432)

Subjects:

Types of Bayesian spatiotemporal models. by Weiwei Meng (304234)

Subjects:

Ecological regression model fitting results. by Weiwei Meng (304234)

Subjects:

Correlation analysis. by Weiwei Meng (304234)

Subjects:

Frontier analysis of injuries’ burden caused by fire, heat, and hot substances from 1990 to 2021. by Shi Huang (125861)

KIF15 interacts with PSD95 and affect its localization in neuronal cytoplasm neurons of the PFC. by Xiaomei He (795333)

Patient status overview. by Farayi Kaseke (19560197)

Subjects:

<i>Kif15</i> deficiency affects the expression of excitatory postsynaptic receptors in PFC and hippocampus. by Xiaomei He (795333)

“…<b>(I and L)</b>: The expression of PSD95, GluA1 and GluN2A in the hippocampus of <i><i>Kif15</i></i>^<i>-/-</i> mice was significantly higher than that of <i><i>Kif15</i></i> WT mice at 11 weeks, n = 7 in each group. …”

Heat map of intestinal microbiota from healthy and diseased shrimp at the genus level. by Lalitphan Kitsanayanyong (19353505)

The linearly decreasing convergence factor a. by Junhao Wei (6816803)

The significant decrease in GLT-1 levels observed in the nucleus accumbens of rats that had consumed morphine for fifty-six days was completely reversed by the co-administration of... by María Elena Quintanilla (8068691)

Map with color coding showing the relative risk of loss at the regional level for each country in Sub-Saharan Africa. by Beatrice T. Nganso (4114768)

Group control-after intervention. by Nan Tang (642590)

“…Comparing the two groups after the intervention, the intervention group demonstrated significantly lower SAS scores (t =  -10.348, P <  0.001), SDS scores (t =  -8.416, P <  0.001), and PSQI scores (t =  -5.087, P <  0.001), while FertiQoL scores were higher than the control group (t =  2.389, P =  0.019). …”

Group SFA-before intervention. by Nan Tang (642590)

“…Comparing the two groups after the intervention, the intervention group demonstrated significantly lower SAS scores (t =  -10.348, P <  0.001), SDS scores (t =  -8.416, P <  0.001), and PSQI scores (t =  -5.087, P <  0.001), while FertiQoL scores were higher than the control group (t =  2.389, P =  0.019). …”

Lost cases. by Nan Tang (642590)

“…Comparing the two groups after the intervention, the intervention group demonstrated significantly lower SAS scores (t =  -10.348, P <  0.001), SDS scores (t =  -8.416, P <  0.001), and PSQI scores (t =  -5.087, P <  0.001), while FertiQoL scores were higher than the control group (t =  2.389, P =  0.019). …”

Group control-before intervention. by Nan Tang (642590)

“…Comparing the two groups after the intervention, the intervention group demonstrated significantly lower SAS scores (t =  -10.348, P <  0.001), SDS scores (t =  -8.416, P <  0.001), and PSQI scores (t =  -5.087, P <  0.001), while FertiQoL scores were higher than the control group (t =  2.389, P =  0.019). …”

Patient satisfaction with SFA intervention(%). by Nan Tang (642590)

“…Comparing the two groups after the intervention, the intervention group demonstrated significantly lower SAS scores (t =  -10.348, P <  0.001), SDS scores (t =  -8.416, P <  0.001), and PSQI scores (t =  -5.087, P <  0.001), while FertiQoL scores were higher than the control group (t =  2.389, P =  0.019). …”

Pre-Experiment. by Nan Tang (642590)

“…Comparing the two groups after the intervention, the intervention group demonstrated significantly lower SAS scores (t =  -10.348, P <  0.001), SDS scores (t =  -8.416, P <  0.001), and PSQI scores (t =  -5.087, P <  0.001), while FertiQoL scores were higher than the control group (t =  2.389, P =  0.019). …”