Search alternatives:
significantly affected » significantly associated (Expand Search), significantly reduced (Expand Search), significant effect (Expand Search)
significantly marked » significantly larger (Expand Search), significantly linked (Expand Search), significantly improved (Expand Search)
affected decrease » affected areas (Expand Search), effects decreased (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
Showing 1 - 20 results of 179 for search '(( significantly marked decrease ) OR ( significantly affected decrease ))~', query time: 0.39s Refine Results
  1. 1
    related to Fig 4. ROS, K+ efflux and cathepsin B do not affect TNFα production in response to eggs.

    related to Fig 4. ROS, K+ efflux and cathepsin B do not affect TNFα production in response to eggs. by Madhusoodhanan Suresh Kumar Meena Kumari (20896666)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 2
    (A) Auxiliary marking points to ensure complete and accurate seating of the prosthesis.

    (A) Auxiliary marking points to ensure complete and accurate seating of the prosthesis. by Long Li (6555)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 3
    The significant decrease in GLT-1 levels observed in the nucleus accumbens of rats that had consumed morphine for fifty-six days was completely reversed by the co-administration of NAC (40 mg/kg/day, i.p.) and ibudilast (7.5 mg/kg/day, i.p.).

    The significant decrease in GLT-1 levels observed in the nucleus accumbens of rats that had consumed morphine for fifty-six days was completely reversed by the co-administration of... by María Elena Quintanilla (8068691)

    Published 2024
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 4
    Trends in overall global leukemia burden, 1990-2021.

    Trends in overall global leukemia burden, 1990-2021. by Chengjun Hu (588206)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 5
    Projected global leukemia burden, 1990-2050.

    Projected global leukemia burden, 1990-2050. by Chengjun Hu (588206)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  6. 6
    Map of the overall global burden of leukemia, 1990-2021.

    Map of the overall global burden of leukemia, 1990-2021. by Chengjun Hu (588206)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  7. 7
    Project the global leukemia burden in patients younger and older than 20 years.

    Project the global leukemia burden in patients younger and older than 20 years. by Chengjun Hu (588206)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  8. 8
    Leukemia ASDR and SDI for 204 countries and territories in 2021.

    Leukemia ASDR and SDI for 204 countries and territories in 2021. by Chengjun Hu (588206)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  9. 9
    Map of the overall global leukemia burden status, 1990-2021.

    Map of the overall global leukemia burden status, 1990-2021. by Chengjun Hu (588206)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  10. 10
    Frontier analysis based on SDI and age-standardized leukemia ASDR per 100,000 population from 1990 to 2021.

    Frontier analysis based on SDI and age-standardized leukemia ASDR per 100,000 population from 1990 to 2021. by Chengjun Hu (588206)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  11. 11
    Correlation between HDI and EAPC.

    Correlation between HDI and EAPC. by Chengjun Hu (588206)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  12. 12
    Global leukemia incidence and EAPC, 1990-2021.

    Global leukemia incidence and EAPC, 1990-2021. by Chengjun Hu (588206)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  13. 13
    Global and five SDI regions’ leukemia burden trends, 1990-2021.

    Global and five SDI regions’ leukemia burden trends, 1990-2021. by Chengjun Hu (588206)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  14. 14
    Global Distribution of the Number of Males and Females with Leukemia.

    Global Distribution of the Number of Males and Females with Leukemia. by Chengjun Hu (588206)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  15. 15
    Leukemia ASDR by SDI for 22 GBD regions from 1990 to 2021.

    Leukemia ASDR by SDI for 22 GBD regions from 1990 to 2021. by Chengjun Hu (588206)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  16. 16
    Joinpoint regression analysis of global leukemia incidence in males and females from 1990 to 2021.

    Joinpoint regression analysis of global leukemia incidence in males and females from 1990 to 2021. by Chengjun Hu (588206)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  17. 17
    The Laboratory Animal Flow Diagram.

    The Laboratory Animal Flow Diagram. by Xueqin lu (22250795)

    Published 2025
    “…The non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) activity score (NAS) demonstrated a significant reduction of up to 3.7 points (P < 0.0001), while the fibrosis score decreased by 0.6 points (P < 0.05). …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  18. 18
    <sup>1</sup>H NMR spectra for kylo-0603.

    <sup>1</sup>H NMR spectra for kylo-0603. by Xueqin lu (22250795)

    Published 2025
    “…The non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) activity score (NAS) demonstrated a significant reduction of up to 3.7 points (P < 0.0001), while the fibrosis score decreased by 0.6 points (P < 0.05). …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  19. 19
    <sup>13</sup>C NMR spectra for Kylo-0603.

    <sup>13</sup>C NMR spectra for Kylo-0603. by Xueqin lu (22250795)

    Published 2025
    “…The non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) activity score (NAS) demonstrated a significant reduction of up to 3.7 points (P < 0.0001), while the fibrosis score decreased by 0.6 points (P < 0.05). …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  20. 20
    The structures of T3 and Kylo-0603.

    The structures of T3 and Kylo-0603. by Xueqin lu (22250795)

    Published 2025
    “…The non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) activity score (NAS) demonstrated a significant reduction of up to 3.7 points (P < 0.0001), while the fibrosis score decreased by 0.6 points (P < 0.05). …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:

Search Tools: