Showing 41 - 60 results of 8,688 for search '(( significantly modulated decrease ) OR ( significantly ((larger decrease) OR (teer decrease)) ))', query time: 0.32s Refine Results
  1. 41
  2. 42
  3. 43

    Y-27632 collaborated with BA to attenuate the increase in the integrity and decrease in the permeability of epithelial barrier injury induced by LPS in Caco2 monolayers. by Luqiong Liu (11537092)

    Published 2024
    “…<p>(<b>A)</b> Y-27632 collaborated with BA to attenuate the effect of LPS on TEER in Caco2 cells on days 1–22. (<b>B)</b> Y-27632 collaborated with BA to attenuate the effect of LPS on TEER in Caco2 cells on day 22. …”
  4. 44
  5. 45
  6. 46

    Scheme of g-λ model with larger values λ. by Zhanfeng Fan (20390992)

    Published 2024
    “…The findings suggest that when λ is respectively equal to 4.19, 8.57, 10, and 12.15, the peak particle velocity (PPV) of the transmitted waves is significantly close to the incident wave amplitude. Furthermore, when λ is fixed, the energy transmission coefficient increases with the incident wave amplitude but decreases with the incident wave frequency. …”
  7. 47
  8. 48
  9. 49
  10. 50
  11. 51
  12. 52

    S1 File - by C. Vijay Reena Durai (14498259)

    Published 2023
    “…Monocular and binocular FMT’s increased with decreasing target size for all retinal locations (p<0.001), and were overall larger for mesopic than for photopic condition (p<0.001). …”
  13. 53

    The effect of HA digestion and HA replenishment alone or with CS on barrier function measured by TEER. by Charlotte J. van Ginkel (20790466)

    Published 2025
    “…PS decreased TEER. (C) Different treatments (treatment groups n = 8)with HA and/or CS did not affect TEER recovery after PS treatment, full recovery was seen in all groups after 24 hours. …”
  14. 54
  15. 55
  16. 56
  17. 57

    Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice. by Udaysankar Chockanathan (18510288)

    Published 2024
    “…The spatial information in dCA1 was significantly larger than circularly shuffled spike trains with similar mean firing rates for C57BL/6 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.132 ± 0.048, shuffled = 0.124 ± 0.035, p < 0.001, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 305 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 30500 simulated units from 5 recording sessions), but not for APP/PS1 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.128 ± 0.051, shuffled = 0.123 ± .047, p = 0.39, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 180 units from 4 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 18000 simulated units from 4 recording sessions). …”
  18. 58
  19. 59
  20. 60