Showing 121 - 140 results of 23,122 for search '(( significantly modulated decrease ) OR ( significantly higher decrease ))', query time: 2.74s Refine Results
  1. 121
  2. 122
  3. 123
  4. 124
  5. 125
  6. 126
  7. 127
  8. 128
  9. 129
  10. 130

    Surfactant-Mediated Structural Modulations to Planar, Amphiphilic Multilamellar Stacks by Daniel J. Speer (13152994)

    Published 2023
    “…The mixed mesophases generally decreased in lamellar spacing (<i>D</i>) and headgroup-to-headgroup distance (<i>D</i><sub>hh</sub>) with a higher concentration of the doped surfactant, but trends in water layer thickness (<i>D</i><sub>w</sub>) between each bilayer in the stack are highly variable. …”
  11. 131

    Surfactant-Mediated Structural Modulations to Planar, Amphiphilic Multilamellar Stacks by Daniel J. Speer (13152994)

    Published 2023
    “…The mixed mesophases generally decreased in lamellar spacing (<i>D</i>) and headgroup-to-headgroup distance (<i>D</i><sub>hh</sub>) with a higher concentration of the doped surfactant, but trends in water layer thickness (<i>D</i><sub>w</sub>) between each bilayer in the stack are highly variable. …”
  12. 132

    Surfactant-Mediated Structural Modulations to Planar, Amphiphilic Multilamellar Stacks by Daniel J. Speer (13152994)

    Published 2023
    “…The mixed mesophases generally decreased in lamellar spacing (<i>D</i>) and headgroup-to-headgroup distance (<i>D</i><sub>hh</sub>) with a higher concentration of the doped surfactant, but trends in water layer thickness (<i>D</i><sub>w</sub>) between each bilayer in the stack are highly variable. …”
  13. 133

    Surfactant-Mediated Structural Modulations to Planar, Amphiphilic Multilamellar Stacks by Daniel J. Speer (13152994)

    Published 2023
    “…The mixed mesophases generally decreased in lamellar spacing (<i>D</i>) and headgroup-to-headgroup distance (<i>D</i><sub>hh</sub>) with a higher concentration of the doped surfactant, but trends in water layer thickness (<i>D</i><sub>w</sub>) between each bilayer in the stack are highly variable. …”
  14. 134

    Surfactant-Mediated Structural Modulations to Planar, Amphiphilic Multilamellar Stacks by Daniel J. Speer (13152994)

    Published 2023
    “…The mixed mesophases generally decreased in lamellar spacing (<i>D</i>) and headgroup-to-headgroup distance (<i>D</i><sub>hh</sub>) with a higher concentration of the doped surfactant, but trends in water layer thickness (<i>D</i><sub>w</sub>) between each bilayer in the stack are highly variable. …”
  15. 135

    Surfactant-Mediated Structural Modulations to Planar, Amphiphilic Multilamellar Stacks by Daniel J. Speer (13152994)

    Published 2023
    “…The mixed mesophases generally decreased in lamellar spacing (<i>D</i>) and headgroup-to-headgroup distance (<i>D</i><sub>hh</sub>) with a higher concentration of the doped surfactant, but trends in water layer thickness (<i>D</i><sub>w</sub>) between each bilayer in the stack are highly variable. …”
  16. 136

    Surfactant-Mediated Structural Modulations to Planar, Amphiphilic Multilamellar Stacks by Daniel J. Speer (13152994)

    Published 2023
    “…The mixed mesophases generally decreased in lamellar spacing (<i>D</i>) and headgroup-to-headgroup distance (<i>D</i><sub>hh</sub>) with a higher concentration of the doped surfactant, but trends in water layer thickness (<i>D</i><sub>w</sub>) between each bilayer in the stack are highly variable. …”
  17. 137

    Surfactant-Mediated Structural Modulations to Planar, Amphiphilic Multilamellar Stacks by Daniel J. Speer (13152994)

    Published 2023
    “…The mixed mesophases generally decreased in lamellar spacing (<i>D</i>) and headgroup-to-headgroup distance (<i>D</i><sub>hh</sub>) with a higher concentration of the doped surfactant, but trends in water layer thickness (<i>D</i><sub>w</sub>) between each bilayer in the stack are highly variable. …”
  18. 138

    Surfactant-Mediated Structural Modulations to Planar, Amphiphilic Multilamellar Stacks by Daniel J. Speer (13152994)

    Published 2023
    “…The mixed mesophases generally decreased in lamellar spacing (<i>D</i>) and headgroup-to-headgroup distance (<i>D</i><sub>hh</sub>) with a higher concentration of the doped surfactant, but trends in water layer thickness (<i>D</i><sub>w</sub>) between each bilayer in the stack are highly variable. …”
  19. 139
  20. 140