Search alternatives:
significantly observed » significantly bolstered (Expand Search), significantly altered (Expand Search), significantly clustered (Expand Search)
largest decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
significantly observed » significantly bolstered (Expand Search), significantly altered (Expand Search), significantly clustered (Expand Search)
largest decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
-
5441
Supplementary file 6_Development and preliminary clinical feasibility of a Delphi-based aerobic exercise prescription for children with asthma.docx
Published 2025“…The expert authority coefficient (Cr) was 0.86, and the coefficient of variation (CV) for item importance scores decreased across rounds (from 0.07–0.16 in Round 1 to 0.07–0.13 in Round 2), indicating high expert consensus. …”
-
5442
Supplementary file 1_Development and preliminary clinical feasibility of a Delphi-based aerobic exercise prescription for children with asthma.docx
Published 2025“…The expert authority coefficient (Cr) was 0.86, and the coefficient of variation (CV) for item importance scores decreased across rounds (from 0.07–0.16 in Round 1 to 0.07–0.13 in Round 2), indicating high expert consensus. …”
-
5443
Supplementary file 5_Development and preliminary clinical feasibility of a Delphi-based aerobic exercise prescription for children with asthma.docx
Published 2025“…The expert authority coefficient (Cr) was 0.86, and the coefficient of variation (CV) for item importance scores decreased across rounds (from 0.07–0.16 in Round 1 to 0.07–0.13 in Round 2), indicating high expert consensus. …”
-
5444
Supplementary file 4_Development and preliminary clinical feasibility of a Delphi-based aerobic exercise prescription for children with asthma.docx
Published 2025“…The expert authority coefficient (Cr) was 0.86, and the coefficient of variation (CV) for item importance scores decreased across rounds (from 0.07–0.16 in Round 1 to 0.07–0.13 in Round 2), indicating high expert consensus. …”