Metabolic differences between RTS and FC osteoblasts. by Brittany E. Jewell (11886281)

“…<p>(A-E) Enzyme activity of complexes I and III (A), complex II (B), complexes II and III (C), complex IV (D), and citrate synthase (E) show no significant difference between RTS and FC osteoblasts, leaving complex I as the only component of the electron transport chain with upregulated activity. n = 3 biological replicates. …”

Analysis of differences between bee groups by using Dunn’s test (significant species for only significant viruses). by Tugce Olgun (8967761)

“…<p>Analysis of differences between bee groups by using Dunn’s test (significant species for only significant viruses).…”

Association between urinary BPA exposure levels in childhood and serum thyroid hormone concentrations in adolescence. by Jung Eun Choi (563339)

Subjects:

Presentation for different studied faults. by Basem Abd-Elhamed Rashad (17781467)

Subjects:

Join-point regression analysis of the statistically significant linear increase in use of antidepressants during the observed time period. by Jelena Filimonovic (22305307)

The data used for comparison of monthly variations between simulated NEP with observed NEE in four ecosystem flux stations in 2003. by Junfang Zhao (299684)

Subjects:

This figure shows the average RT difference between the conditions <i>GG</i> and <i>PH</i>(<i>PH</i>-<i>GG</i>) for each participant. by Howe Yuan Zhu (17283139)

List of Included studies. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”

The search strategy in three databases. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”

A summary of the included study characteristics. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”

NIH score. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”

List of excluded studies. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”

Schematic diagram for the association between different clinical laboratory data and CT severity score in COVID-19 patients. by Ahmed Ismail (2671822)

Subjects:

No significant difference of ROS level was observed between WT and KO mice at the tick bite site. by Xiaotian Tang (17262899)

Bacterial taxa with a significant difference in the relative abundance between UnH and InH. by Pei P. Fu (12407203)

Respondents’ age (n = 448). No significant difference between the subgroups was identified (p > 0.05). by Aurélien Auger (20957264)

“…<p>Respondents’ age (n = 448). No significant difference between the subgroups was identified (p > 0.05).…”

GLMM results indicating significant difference in all diversity metrics between ground and roof habitats. by Michael L. McKinney (7866356)

“…<p>GLMM results indicating significant difference in all diversity metrics between ground and roof habitats.…”

Average test-set observed-expected correlation difference between all methods with significance value. by Oliver Pain (7735250)

Test for the significance of the difference between top two Spearman correlation scores for each cartridge sample. by Nikola Ladislavová (14828306)

“…<p>Test for the significance of the difference between top two Spearman correlation scores for each cartridge sample.…”

Brain areas of significant VBM difference between the breastmilk-fed group and formula-fed group. by Yao Zhang (134381)

“…<p>Brain areas of significant VBM difference between the breastmilk-fed group and formula-fed group.…”