Search alternatives:
significant increased » significant increase (Expand Search), significant increases (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significantly point » significantly onto (Expand Search), significantly poorer (Expand Search), significantly lower (Expand Search)
increased release » increased reliance (Expand Search), increased relative (Expand Search), increased levels (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
significant increased » significant increase (Expand Search), significant increases (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significantly point » significantly onto (Expand Search), significantly poorer (Expand Search), significantly lower (Expand Search)
increased release » increased reliance (Expand Search), increased relative (Expand Search), increased levels (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.
Published 2024“…<p>Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”
-
3
Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.
Published 2024“…<p>Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”
-
4
Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.
Published 2024“…<p>Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”
-
5
-
6
-
7
C1 alone does not evoke NO release, an increase in cell activity or release of pro-inflammatory cytokines.
Published 2023“…As shown in <b><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0278325#pone.0278325.g001" target="_blank">Fig 1</a></b>, LPS stimulation induced a significant increase in NO release (p<0.0001). Treatment with C1 or DMSO did not show any significant difference compared to untreated microglia (in white). …”
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
AZ10606120 treatment does not significantly increase apoptosis mediated cell death.
Published 2025Subjects: -
15
Increased AP release upon hypotonicity is dependent on Matriptase.
Published 2023“…(B,E) Subtraction of luminescence values of 320 mOsm from 150 mOsm indicate a significantly higher net increase of AP release in double transfected cells compared to cells transfected with pcDNA3+AP-Par2b alone. …”
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20