Search alternatives:
significantly point » significantly onto (Expand Search), significantly poorer (Expand Search), significantly lower (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
significantly point » significantly onto (Expand Search), significantly poorer (Expand Search), significantly lower (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
Study selection criteria.
Published 2025“…CAPS improvement was persistent for CPT and PE in long-term follow up (mean duration 6.2 years).</p><p>MDMA-AT demonstrated significant improvement in BDI-II score compared to PT (19.7-point vs. 10.8-point decrease, respectively; p = 0.003). …”
-
3
PICOS criteria for the SLR.
Published 2025“…CAPS improvement was persistent for CPT and PE in long-term follow up (mean duration 6.2 years).</p><p>MDMA-AT demonstrated significant improvement in BDI-II score compared to PT (19.7-point vs. 10.8-point decrease, respectively; p = 0.003). …”
-
4
PRISMA flow chart.
Published 2025“…CAPS improvement was persistent for CPT and PE in long-term follow up (mean duration 6.2 years).</p><p>MDMA-AT demonstrated significant improvement in BDI-II score compared to PT (19.7-point vs. 10.8-point decrease, respectively; p = 0.003). …”
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
pone.0331193.t003 -
Published 2025“…The global cognitive score increased by 4.6 points (5%) in the intervention group compared to a decrease of 0.5 points in the control group (p < 0.001). …”
-
20
Baseline characteristics by group.
Published 2025“…The global cognitive score increased by 4.6 points (5%) in the intervention group compared to a decrease of 0.5 points in the control group (p < 0.001). …”