Search alternatives:
significantly predicted » significantly reduced (Expand Search), significantly reduce (Expand Search), significant predictor (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
predicted decrease » predicted secreted (Expand Search), reported decrease (Expand Search)
decrease reverse » decreased levels (Expand Search)
Showing 41 - 60 results of 11,795 for search '(( significantly predicted decrease ) OR ( significant decrease reverse ))', query time: 0.29s Refine Results
  1. 41
    (a) M-K test of annual average water level in Caspian Sea (unformatted fit (UF) and underidentification bias (UB) is positive and reverse order in the time series respectively; ɑ is the significance level); (b) Pettitt test statistic (ɑ is the significance level, KT is the statistic of Pettitt test).

    (a) M-K test of annual average water level in Caspian Sea (unformatted fit (UF) and underidentification bias (UB) is positive and reverse order in the time series respectively; ɑ i... by Zihao Duan (17403792)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 42
    The PPIC Model, methods and predictions.

    The PPIC Model, methods and predictions. by Aoife M. Fitzpatrick (13955365)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 43
    Infection at a later timepoint still enables tumour growth restriction but previous infection reverses the effect.

    Infection at a later timepoint still enables tumour growth restriction but previous infection reverses the effect. by Philine Steinbach (17847521)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 44
    After moderate and severe TBI, PWI revealed CBF was significantly decreased in the ipsilateral cortex and hippocampus at several time points relative to sham animals.

    After moderate and severe TBI, PWI revealed CBF was significantly decreased in the ipsilateral cortex and hippocampus at several time points relative to sham animals. by Juliana Sanchez-Molano (16792787)

    Published 2023
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 45
    Nineteen SNPs with significant association (<i>P < </i>5 × 10<sup>−8</sup>) with risk on minJSW decrease in knee OA.

    Nineteen SNPs with significant association (<i>P < </i>5 × 10<sup>−8</sup>) with risk on minJSW decrease in knee OA. by Mieke L. M. Bentvelzen (21594442)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  6. 46
    Data cleaning and preparation algorithm.

    Data cleaning and preparation algorithm. by Ayana Ablayeva (22103708)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  7. 47
    Decreased regulatory T cells and increased monocytes are observed in peripheral blood of obese mice.

    Decreased regulatory T cells and increased monocytes are observed in peripheral blood of obese mice. by Aleida Núñez-Ruiz (12463062)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  8. 48
    Mean decrease Gini score by Tweet and user characteristics.

    Mean decrease Gini score by Tweet and user characteristics. by Gray Babbs (16648894)

    Published 2023
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  9. 49
    Heatmap of the significant taxa in the hindgut of grass carp.

    Heatmap of the significant taxa in the hindgut of grass carp. by Pei P. Fu (12407203)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  10. 50
    Maximum IFN concentrations are decreased in severe patients.

    Maximum IFN concentrations are decreased in severe patients. by Sonia T. Gazeau (21512764)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  11. 51
    Preference for the EIA – conjoint results.

    Preference for the EIA – conjoint results. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  12. 52
    Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios.

    Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  13. 53
    Sample attribute table.

    Sample attribute table. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  14. 54
    Subgroup analysis – Political affiliation.

    Subgroup analysis – Political affiliation. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  15. 55
    Sample scenario description.

    Sample scenario description. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  16. 56
    AMCEs – Pooled across scenarios.

    AMCEs – Pooled across scenarios. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  17. 57
    Methodological flowchart.

    Methodological flowchart. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  18. 58
    Preference for the EIA vs. ETA across scenarios.

    Preference for the EIA vs. ETA across scenarios. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  19. 59
    Meta-analysis of peak as a percentage of predicted and morbidity.

    Meta-analysis of peak as a percentage of predicted and morbidity. by Nabeela Arbee-Kalidas (17598969)

    Published 2023
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  20. 60
    Meta-analysis of (slope and as a percentage of predicted) and mortality.

    Meta-analysis of (slope and as a percentage of predicted) and mortality. by Nabeela Arbee-Kalidas (17598969)

    Published 2023
    Save to List
    Saved in:

Search Tools: