Search alternatives:
significantly predicted » significantly reduced (Expand Search), significantly reduce (Expand Search), significant predictor (Expand Search)
predicted decrease » predicted secreted (Expand Search), reported decrease (Expand Search)
significant larger » significantly larger (Expand Search), significant barrier (Expand Search), significantly longer (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
significantly predicted » significantly reduced (Expand Search), significantly reduce (Expand Search), significant predictor (Expand Search)
predicted decrease » predicted secreted (Expand Search), reported decrease (Expand Search)
significant larger » significantly larger (Expand Search), significant barrier (Expand Search), significantly longer (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
-
21
-
22
-
23
-
24
-
25
-
26
-
27
-
28
-
29
-
30
Scheme of g-λ model with larger values λ.
Published 2024“…The findings suggest that when λ is respectively equal to 4.19, 8.57, 10, and 12.15, the peak particle velocity (PPV) of the transmitted waves is significantly close to the incident wave amplitude. Furthermore, when λ is fixed, the energy transmission coefficient increases with the incident wave amplitude but decreases with the incident wave frequency. …”
-
31
Spike prediction coherence and NST standard deviation as a function of size of recent event history.
Published 2023Subjects: -
32
-
33
-
34
-
35
-
36
Spatial information of excitatory neurons in APP/PS1 mice are decreased in dCA1 and vCA1.
Published 2024“…The spatial information in dCA1 was significantly larger than circularly shuffled spike trains with similar mean firing rates for C57BL/6 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.134 ± 0.050, shuffled = 0.123 ± 0.035, p < 0.005, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 229 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 22900 simulated units from 5 recording sessions), but not for APP/PS1 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.132 ± 0.054, shuffled = 0.124 ± .054, p = 0.13, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 124 units from 4 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 12400 simulated units from 4 recording sessions). …”
-
37
-
38
-
39
-
40