Search alternatives:
significantly predicted » significantly reduced (Expand Search), significantly reduce (Expand Search), significant predictor (Expand Search)
predicted decrease » predicted secreted (Expand Search), reported decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significantly predicted » significantly reduced (Expand Search), significantly reduce (Expand Search), significant predictor (Expand Search)
predicted decrease » predicted secreted (Expand Search), reported decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
Parameters used in the simulations.
Published 2025“…Similarly, increasing the equivalent diameter from 3.78 mm to 8.82 mm led to a 20–35% rise in peak stress. At the particle scale, both normal and tangential contact forces increased with larger equivalent diameters but exhibited complex dependencies on morphology due to varied contact patterns. …”
-
9
Two ellipsoidal particles in contact.
Published 2025“…Similarly, increasing the equivalent diameter from 3.78 mm to 8.82 mm led to a 20–35% rise in peak stress. At the particle scale, both normal and tangential contact forces increased with larger equivalent diameters but exhibited complex dependencies on morphology due to varied contact patterns. …”
-
10
Different contact patterns for two ellipsoids.
Published 2025“…Similarly, increasing the equivalent diameter from 3.78 mm to 8.82 mm led to a 20–35% rise in peak stress. At the particle scale, both normal and tangential contact forces increased with larger equivalent diameters but exhibited complex dependencies on morphology due to varied contact patterns. …”
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20