Search alternatives:
significantly predictions » significantly predictive (Expand Search), significant predictors (Expand Search), significant reductions (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
predictions based » prediction based (Expand Search), prediction tasks (Expand Search), prediction task (Expand Search)
significantly predictions » significantly predictive (Expand Search), significant predictors (Expand Search), significant reductions (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
predictions based » prediction based (Expand Search), prediction tasks (Expand Search), prediction task (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
The variables that significantly predicted litter clump weight in shelter cats.
Published 2025“…C) Fewer days in the study predicted greater urine output (p = .034). The black line represents the line of best fit based on the reduced model with marginal means. …”
-
3
-
4
-
5
Cat Stress Score (CSS) was significantly predicted by intake type and days in the study.
Published 2025“…B) More days in the study predicted lower CSS (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The black line represents the line of best fit based on the reduced model with marginal means. …”
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
Validation of genetic markers for risk of OA or knee OA for decrease in minJSW.
Published 2025Subjects: -
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
Maximum IFN concentrations are decreased in severe patients.
Published 2025“…Statistical differences in maximal IFN values between groups are marked by a level of significance (*) estimated based on p-values above the box plots (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.005; ***, p < 0.0005; ****, p < 5e-5). …”
-
19
Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).
Published 2025“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).…”
-
20