Showing 461 - 480 results of 21,342 for search '(( significantly reduce decrease ) OR ( significant decrease decrease ))', query time: 0.53s Refine Results
  1. 461

    A Novel Type of PSMA-Targeting Ligands via β‑Branched Aromatic α‑Amino Acid Modification, Bearing Enhanced Tumor Targeting and Reduced Renal Toxicity by Zong-Xiao Liu (22177765)

    Published 2025
    “…With average renal uptake of less than 10%ID/g, as opposed to 25%ID/g for [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-<b>PSMA-617</b>, this substantial decrease in renal accumulation translates to a significantly improved safety profile by minimizing nephrotoxic risks. …”
  2. 462

    A Novel Type of PSMA-Targeting Ligands via β‑Branched Aromatic α‑Amino Acid Modification, Bearing Enhanced Tumor Targeting and Reduced Renal Toxicity by Zong-Xiao Liu (22177765)

    Published 2025
    “…With average renal uptake of less than 10%ID/g, as opposed to 25%ID/g for [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-<b>PSMA-617</b>, this substantial decrease in renal accumulation translates to a significantly improved safety profile by minimizing nephrotoxic risks. …”
  3. 463
  4. 464
  5. 465

    Combination of intraperitoneal and intratumoral administration of vitamin D3 is more effective in reducing the EAC tumor volume compared to just i.p. administration: by Vidya G. Bettada (22208808)

    Published 2025
    “…Administration of cisplatin (2.5 mg/Kg) and vitamin D3 (125 µg/Kg) significantly decreased the vessel density (CD31) compared to the tumor control group.…”
  6. 466
  7. 467
  8. 468
  9. 469
  10. 470
  11. 471
  12. 472
  13. 473
  14. 474
  15. 475
  16. 476
  17. 477
  18. 478
  19. 479

    Data Sheet 1_Previous COVID-19 infection significantly reduces elastase levels in newly diagnosed pulmonary tuberculosis patients.pdf by Nancy Hilda Joseph (21837314)

    Published 2025
    “…</p>Results<p>Although Citrullinated Histone H3 and myeloperoxidase, did not show any difference in their levels, the NET marker elastase had significantly reduced circulatory levels in the tuberculosis group with SARS-CoV IgG positivity compared to tuberculosis group without SARS-CoV-2 IgG positivity.…”
  20. 480