Search alternatives:
significantly reduce » significantly reduced (Expand Search), significantly greater (Expand Search), significantly enhance (Expand Search)
increase decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
reduce decrease » reduce disease (Expand Search), reduce depressive (Expand Search), induces decreased (Expand Search)
significantly reduce » significantly reduced (Expand Search), significantly greater (Expand Search), significantly enhance (Expand Search)
increase decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
reduce decrease » reduce disease (Expand Search), reduce depressive (Expand Search), induces decreased (Expand Search)
-
1941
-
1942
-
1943
-
1944
Transcript levels of MAPK, NIK, NLR and SA-depended gene pathways and responsive genes.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1945
-
1946
Transcript levels of MAPK, NIK, NLR and SA-dependent gene pathways and responsive genes.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1947
-
1948
Total count of HiFi reads indicating gene variation in 24 cassava genotypes.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1949
-
1950
-
1951
-
1952
-
1953
-
1954
Difference in
Published 2025“…Compared with the resting levels, the alpha/beta ratio of EEG (indicating relaxed concentration) was significantly decreased by 19% in the video-based VR and increased by 40% in the immersive VR groups (both p < 0.05). …”
-
1955
Experimental protocol.
Published 2025“…Compared with the resting levels, the alpha/beta ratio of EEG (indicating relaxed concentration) was significantly decreased by 19% in the video-based VR and increased by 40% in the immersive VR groups (both p < 0.05). …”
-
1956
Relationship between the change in
Published 2025“…Compared with the resting levels, the alpha/beta ratio of EEG (indicating relaxed concentration) was significantly decreased by 19% in the video-based VR and increased by 40% in the immersive VR groups (both p < 0.05). …”
-
1957
Preference for the EIA – conjoint results.
Published 2025“…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
1958
Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios.
Published 2025“…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
1959
Sample attribute table.
Published 2025“…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
1960
Subgroup analysis – Political affiliation.
Published 2025“…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”