Showing 1,941 - 1,960 results of 15,416 for search '(( significantly reduce decrease ) OR ( significant increase decrease ))', query time: 0.47s Refine Results
  1. 1941
  2. 1942
  3. 1943
  4. 1944
  5. 1945
  6. 1946
  7. 1947
  8. 1948
  9. 1949
  10. 1950
  11. 1951
  12. 1952
  13. 1953
  14. 1954

    Difference in by Akihiro Kakimoto (343218)

    Published 2025
    “…Compared with the resting levels, the alpha/beta ratio of EEG (indicating relaxed concentration) was significantly decreased by 19% in the video-based VR and increased by 40% in the immersive VR groups (both p < 0.05). …”
  15. 1955

    Experimental protocol. by Akihiro Kakimoto (343218)

    Published 2025
    “…Compared with the resting levels, the alpha/beta ratio of EEG (indicating relaxed concentration) was significantly decreased by 19% in the video-based VR and increased by 40% in the immersive VR groups (both p < 0.05). …”
  16. 1956

    Relationship between the change in by Akihiro Kakimoto (343218)

    Published 2025
    “…Compared with the resting levels, the alpha/beta ratio of EEG (indicating relaxed concentration) was significantly decreased by 19% in the video-based VR and increased by 40% in the immersive VR groups (both p < 0.05). …”
  17. 1957

    Preference for the EIA – conjoint results. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  18. 1958

    Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  19. 1959

    Sample attribute table. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  20. 1960

    Subgroup analysis – Political affiliation. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”