Showing 101 - 120 results of 26,543 for search '(( significantly reduced decrease ) OR ( significant decrease reverse ))', query time: 0.57s Refine Results
  1. 101
  2. 102
  3. 103
  4. 104
  5. 105
  6. 106
  7. 107

    Decreased BMP activity in MZ<i>nanog</i> is rescued by knocking down of <i>ctnnb2</i>. by Mudan He (7017239)

    Published 2020
    “…Error bars, mean ± SD, **<i>P</i> < 0.01; NS means no significant difference. (B) Relative mRNA level of <i>admp</i> was significantly decreased in MZ<i>nanog</i> at 6 hpf, and <i>radar</i> was significantly up-regulated at 2 hpf by RT-qPCR analysis. …”
  8. 108
  9. 109
  10. 110
  11. 111
  12. 112

    Preference for the EIA – conjoint results. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
  13. 113

    Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
  14. 114

    Sample attribute table. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
  15. 115

    Subgroup analysis – Political affiliation. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
  16. 116

    Sample scenario description. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
  17. 117

    AMCEs – Pooled across scenarios. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
  18. 118

    Methodological flowchart. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
  19. 119

    Preference for the EIA vs. ETA across scenarios. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
  20. 120