Search alternatives:
significantly reported » significantly related (Expand Search), significantly restored (Expand Search), significantly predicted (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
reported decrease » reported disease (Expand Search), reported depressive (Expand Search), reported case (Expand Search)
decrease during » increases during (Expand Search), decreased firing (Expand Search)
significantly reported » significantly related (Expand Search), significantly restored (Expand Search), significantly predicted (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
reported decrease » reported disease (Expand Search), reported depressive (Expand Search), reported case (Expand Search)
decrease during » increases during (Expand Search), decreased firing (Expand Search)
-
61
-
62
The frequency of consumption of particular foods during the COVID-19 pandemic (n = 348).
Published 2022Subjects: -
63
Self-reported life events.
Published 2024“…Significant reduction in the quality of life was coincident with a trend of lower recovery activity participation (31% decline) during the pandemic.…”
-
64
-
65
-
66
-
67
-
68
-
69
-
70
S1 Dataset -
Published 2023“…The prevalence of high AIP significantly decreased in women and showed no significant changes in men.…”
-
71
-
72
GTDE decreased the expression of the NLRP3 inflammasome and AGEs in the cerebral cortex.
Published 2022Subjects: -
73
-
74
-
75
-
76
-
77
Table_1_Decrease in the number of new cancer diagnoses during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic – cohort study of 3.5 million individuals in western Poland.docx
Published 2023“…Among men, the most significant difference was reported for myeloma (SIR 0·59, 95% CI 0·45 to 0·77), among women for bone cancer (SIR 0·47, 95% CI 0·20 to 0·93). …”
-
78
-
79
ECoG timescales decrease during spatial attention.
Published 2025“…Bottom: timescales significantly decrease during covert attention relative to the attend-out condition (two locations: <i>p</i> = 0.0244; four locations: <i>p</i> < 0.0001; mean ± SEM; whiskers indicate maximum and minimum; dots correspond to individual electrodes). …”
-
80