Search alternatives:
significantly scores » significantly shorter (Expand Search), significantly poorer (Expand Search), significantly restored (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significantly scores » significantly shorter (Expand Search), significantly poorer (Expand Search), significantly restored (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
Comparison of questionnaire scores among genotypes for the significant associations.
Published 2025Subjects: -
3
MiR-129-5p levels were decreased in mouse depression models.
Published 2025“…The Y-axis represents the fold change, while the X-axis indicates the significance of differential expression. The gray points represent miRNAs with no significant change (p < 0.05, false discovery rate (FDR) q < 0.05), while red and blue points indicate upregulated and downregulated miRNAs (p < 0.05, FDR q < 0.05), respectively. …”
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
Analysis of the Nugent score before (T=0) and after (T=1) the use of the vaginal gel. Number of participants and respective percentages of Nugent scores before and after the intervention. A statistically significant decrease in Nugent scores was observed after the intervention (p value =0.0047).
Published 2025“…Number of participants and respective percentages of Nugent scores before and after the intervention. A statistically significant decrease in Nugent scores was observed after the intervention (p value =0.0047).…”
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
Validation of genetic markers for risk of OA or knee OA for decrease in minJSW.
Published 2025“…<p><b>(A)</b> Manhattan plot of minJSW decrease at 24 months. …”
-
16
-
17
NIH score.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
18
-
19
-
20