Search alternatives:
significantly shorter » significantly higher (Expand Search), significantly lower (Expand Search), significantly greater (Expand Search)
shorter decrease » reported decrease (Expand Search), scores decreased (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
significantly shorter » significantly higher (Expand Search), significantly lower (Expand Search), significantly greater (Expand Search)
shorter decrease » reported decrease (Expand Search), scores decreased (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
161
-
162
-
163
-
164
-
165
-
166
-
167
-
168
Flow Chart of Study Participant Selection.
Published 2025“…Notably, individuals with long sleep duration (>9 hours) had a significantly decreased risk of CVD (OR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.15–0.85, P = 0.02) compared to those with shorter sleep durations.…”
-
169
-
170
Image 1_Boys born with hypospadias and fetal growth restriction exhibit shorter anogenital distances: a retrospective cross-sectional study.tif
Published 2025“…Linear regression analysis revealed that proximal hypospadias and SGA were significantly associated with shorter AGDs across all measurements (e.g., proximal hypospadias reduced ASD by 6.52 mm, 95% CI: −9.97 to −3.06, P < 0.001; SGA reduced ASD by 4.48 mm, 95% CI: −8.00 to −0.97, P = 0.01). …”
-
171
-
172
-
173
-
174
Basic characteristics included in the study.
Published 2025“…A fixed-effects model was applied if P > 0.1 and I<sup>2</sup> ≤ 50%; otherwise, a random-effects model was used to account for significant heterogeneity Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger’s test. …”
-
175
Publication bias of the risk of all groups.
Published 2025“…A fixed-effects model was applied if P > 0.1 and I<sup>2</sup> ≤ 50%; otherwise, a random-effects model was used to account for significant heterogeneity Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger’s test. …”
-
176
Study selection process.
Published 2025“…A fixed-effects model was applied if P > 0.1 and I<sup>2</sup> ≤ 50%; otherwise, a random-effects model was used to account for significant heterogeneity Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger’s test. …”
-
177
-
178
-
179
-
180