Search alternatives:
significantly slight » significantly lighter (Expand Search), significantly high (Expand Search), significantly higher (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greater increase (Expand Search), greater increases (Expand Search), rate decreased (Expand Search)
slight decrease » slight increase (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
Showing 21 - 40 results of 8,445 for search '(( significantly slight decrease ) OR ( significantly ((larger decrease) OR (greater decrease)) ))', query time: 1.16s Refine Results
  1. 21
    Results of significance for regression factors.

    Results of significance for regression factors. by Junxia Zhou (14381598)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 22
    As compared to HD, RRMS and T1D patients show significantly greater preponderance of rs2281808 CT/TT carriers.

    As compared to HD, RRMS and T1D patients show significantly greater preponderance of rs2281808 CT/TT carriers. by Sushmita Sinha (348580)

    Published 2020
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 23
    Model-averaged coefficients, significance, and relative importance (RI) of the predictor variables for the GLMMs to evaluate effects on: (A) overall pollinator abundance; (B) fruit production per female tree, (C) seed production per female tree; and (D) seed weight. Farming system refers to ecological vs. conventional practices; CCA1 refers to the first axis of the CCA and depicts the relationship between the % of natural habitats in the landscape and the composition of the pollinator community (increase abundance of wild bees with the increase in natural habitats); Male-to-female ratio and Male-to-female ratio<sup>2</sup> indicate linear and quadratic terms, respectively. Significant <i>p</i>-values are marked in bold. RI was estimated by summing the Akaike weights over all the models where each explanatory variable appeared, and highlights the importance of these variables in the models [75].

    Model-averaged coefficients, significance, and relative importance (RI) of the predictor variables for the GLMMs to evaluate effects on: (A) overall pollinator abundance; (B) fruit... by Carmelo Gómez-Martínez (9384385)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 24
    Negative ion mode significant differential metabolites (Fold Change greater than 2 or less than 0.5).

    Negative ion mode significant differential metabolites (Fold Change greater than 2 or less than 0.5). by Peng-fei Han (694841)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 25
    Positive ion mode significant differential metabolites (Fold Change greater than 2 or less than 0.5).

    Positive ion mode significant differential metabolites (Fold Change greater than 2 or less than 0.5). by Peng-fei Han (694841)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  6. 26
    Ranked OD net percent decrease.

    Ranked OD net percent decrease. by Jimy Pinto (4376539)

    Published 2023
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  7. 27
    Availability of modern family planning methods in 2014 and 2017.

    Availability of modern family planning methods in 2014 and 2017. by Rajon Banik (12066099)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  8. 28
    Facilities offering modern family planning services by division in 2014 (A) and 2017 (B).

    Facilities offering modern family planning services by division in 2014 (A) and 2017 (B). by Rajon Banik (12066099)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  9. 29
    Facilities offering modern family planning services by survey years and facility types, 2014 and 2017.

    Facilities offering modern family planning services by survey years and facility types, 2014 and 2017. by Rajon Banik (12066099)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  10. 30
    Factors associated with facility readiness for providing modern family planning services in 2014 and 2017.

    Factors associated with facility readiness for providing modern family planning services in 2014 and 2017. by Rajon Banik (12066099)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  11. 31
    Modern family planning service readiness score by division in 2014 (A) and 2017 (B).

    Modern family planning service readiness score by division in 2014 (A) and 2017 (B). by Rajon Banik (12066099)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  12. 32
    Flowchart of the sample selection procedure from BHFS 2014 and 2017.

    Flowchart of the sample selection procedure from BHFS 2014 and 2017. by Rajon Banik (12066099)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  13. 33
    Mean readiness score of modern family planning service by facility type in 2014 and 2017.

    Mean readiness score of modern family planning service by facility type in 2014 and 2017. by Rajon Banik (12066099)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  14. 34
    Overall and domain-specific mean readiness score by survey years, 2014 and 2017.

    Overall and domain-specific mean readiness score by survey years, 2014 and 2017. by Rajon Banik (12066099)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  15. 35
    Percentage distribution (weighted) of surveyed facilities in 2014 and 2017.

    Percentage distribution (weighted) of surveyed facilities in 2014 and 2017. by Rajon Banik (12066099)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  16. 36
    Datasets used in the study.

    Datasets used in the study. by Rajon Banik (12066099)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  17. 37
    Seasonal trends in Tmax and Tmin over the 34 years period.

    Seasonal trends in Tmax and Tmin over the 34 years period. by Jamal Hassan Ougahi (13513875)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  18. 38
    Energy efficiency variation across cities in the Greater Bay Area.

    Energy efficiency variation across cities in the Greater Bay Area. by YanFei Lei (19532983)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  19. 39
    Change in Watt’s Connectedness Scale, Subscales by Treatment Group.

    Change in Watt’s Connectedness Scale, Subscales by Treatment Group. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  20. 40
    Primary and secondary efficacy end points (intention-to-treat population).

    Primary and secondary efficacy end points (intention-to-treat population). by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:

Search Tools: