Search alternatives:
significantly slight » significantly lighter (Expand Search), significantly high (Expand Search), significantly higher (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greater increase (Expand Search), greater increases (Expand Search), rate decreased (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
increase » increased (Expand Search)
significantly slight » significantly lighter (Expand Search), significantly high (Expand Search), significantly higher (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greater increase (Expand Search), greater increases (Expand Search), rate decreased (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
increase » increased (Expand Search)
-
121
-
122
-
123
-
124
-
125
-
126
Effects of slightly elevated temperatures on concrete materials and structures properties
Published 2025“…The objective of this paper is to synthetize the major findings of the various studies, with a focus on the properties relevant for nuclear power plant concrete structures when subjected to slightly elevated temperatures. To align with CNSC’s philosophy to ensure clarity on the regulatory requirements, the paper will also provide a regulatory perspective on how the CNSC expects that utilities would approach the impact of slightly elevated temperatures on nuclear concrete structures in the Canadian context. …”
-
127
-
128
-
129
-
130
-
131
Impact of the virtual learning environment on the number of correct answers.
Published 2022Subjects: -
132
Academic assessments, level of satisfaction, and applicability of the virtual learning environment.
Published 2022Subjects: -
133
Baseline levels of awareness, attitudes, and intention to practice of the participants (n = 206).
Published 2022Subjects: -
134
-
135
Change in rectal temperature following pre-medication, induction and inhalant anesthesia.
Published 2025Subjects: -
136
-
137
-
138
-
139
Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice.
Published 2024“…The spatial information in dCA1 was significantly larger than circularly shuffled spike trains with similar mean firing rates for C57BL/6 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.132 ± 0.048, shuffled = 0.124 ± 0.035, p < 0.001, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 305 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 30500 simulated units from 5 recording sessions), but not for APP/PS1 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.128 ± 0.051, shuffled = 0.123 ± .047, p = 0.39, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 180 units from 4 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 18000 simulated units from 4 recording sessions). …”
-
140