Search alternatives:
significantly small » significantly smaller (Expand Search), significantly impact (Expand Search), significantly impair (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
small decrease » small increased (Expand Search)
significantly small » significantly smaller (Expand Search), significantly impact (Expand Search), significantly impair (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
small decrease » small increased (Expand Search)
-
1381
-
1382
-
1383
Cross-sectional dependence results.
Published 2024“…Moreover, FDI and the non-linear form of FDI have no significant influence on ecological footprint. …”
-
1384
Autocorrelation test results.
Published 2024“…Moreover, FDI and the non-linear form of FDI have no significant influence on ecological footprint. …”
-
1385
Pesaran’s CADF test results for Model I.
Published 2024“…Moreover, FDI and the non-linear form of FDI have no significant influence on ecological footprint. …”
-
1386
Descriptive statistics of related variables.
Published 2024“…Moreover, FDI and the non-linear form of FDI have no significant influence on ecological footprint. …”
-
1387
Algorithm training accuracy experiments.
Published 2025“…In addition, the detection efficiency of the model for different elements ranged from 0.91 to 0.94, with high accuracy in detecting changes in spatial and temporal scales and small offsets. The actual accuracy and mean latency time of the model were 92.43% and 260ms, respectively. …”
-
1388
Repeat the detection experiment.
Published 2025“…In addition, the detection efficiency of the model for different elements ranged from 0.91 to 0.94, with high accuracy in detecting changes in spatial and temporal scales and small offsets. The actual accuracy and mean latency time of the model were 92.43% and 260ms, respectively. …”
-
1389
Detection network structure with IRAU [34].
Published 2025“…In addition, the detection efficiency of the model for different elements ranged from 0.91 to 0.94, with high accuracy in detecting changes in spatial and temporal scales and small offsets. The actual accuracy and mean latency time of the model were 92.43% and 260ms, respectively. …”
-
1390
Ablation experiments of various block.
Published 2025“…In addition, the detection efficiency of the model for different elements ranged from 0.91 to 0.94, with high accuracy in detecting changes in spatial and temporal scales and small offsets. The actual accuracy and mean latency time of the model were 92.43% and 260ms, respectively. …”
-
1391
Kappa coefficients for different algorithms.
Published 2025“…In addition, the detection efficiency of the model for different elements ranged from 0.91 to 0.94, with high accuracy in detecting changes in spatial and temporal scales and small offsets. The actual accuracy and mean latency time of the model were 92.43% and 260ms, respectively. …”
-
1392
The structure of ASPP+ block.
Published 2025“…In addition, the detection efficiency of the model for different elements ranged from 0.91 to 0.94, with high accuracy in detecting changes in spatial and temporal scales and small offsets. The actual accuracy and mean latency time of the model were 92.43% and 260ms, respectively. …”
-
1393
The structure of attention gate block [31].
Published 2025“…In addition, the detection efficiency of the model for different elements ranged from 0.91 to 0.94, with high accuracy in detecting changes in spatial and temporal scales and small offsets. The actual accuracy and mean latency time of the model were 92.43% and 260ms, respectively. …”
-
1394
DSC block and its application network structure.
Published 2025“…In addition, the detection efficiency of the model for different elements ranged from 0.91 to 0.94, with high accuracy in detecting changes in spatial and temporal scales and small offsets. The actual accuracy and mean latency time of the model were 92.43% and 260ms, respectively. …”
-
1395
The structure of multi-scale residual block [30].
Published 2025“…In addition, the detection efficiency of the model for different elements ranged from 0.91 to 0.94, with high accuracy in detecting changes in spatial and temporal scales and small offsets. The actual accuracy and mean latency time of the model were 92.43% and 260ms, respectively. …”
-
1396
The structure of IRAU and Res2Net+ block [22].
Published 2025“…In addition, the detection efficiency of the model for different elements ranged from 0.91 to 0.94, with high accuracy in detecting changes in spatial and temporal scales and small offsets. The actual accuracy and mean latency time of the model were 92.43% and 260ms, respectively. …”
-
1397
Table 3_The impact of the herd health interventions in small ruminants in low input production systems in Ethiopia.docx
Published 2024“…Introduction<p>Diseases have a negative impact on production and profitability of small ruminants. A good herd health program can decrease the number of sick animals and improve herd performance.…”
-
1398
Table 1_The impact of the herd health interventions in small ruminants in low input production systems in Ethiopia.docx
Published 2024“…Introduction<p>Diseases have a negative impact on production and profitability of small ruminants. A good herd health program can decrease the number of sick animals and improve herd performance.…”
-
1399
Table 2_The impact of the herd health interventions in small ruminants in low input production systems in Ethiopia.docx
Published 2024“…Introduction<p>Diseases have a negative impact on production and profitability of small ruminants. A good herd health program can decrease the number of sick animals and improve herd performance.…”
-
1400
Comparison of Mean Absolute Error (MAE) in Millimeters as a Function of Kernel Size.
Published 2025“…<p>Fig 8 presents the mean absolute error (MAE) in millimeters as a function of kernel size (in pixels) for two model configurations. …”