Search alternatives:
significantly used » significantly reduced (Expand Search), significantly faster (Expand Search), significantly linked (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
used increases » use increased (Expand Search), ses increases (Expand Search), us1 increases (Expand Search)
alter decrease » water decreases (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), alter disease (Expand Search)
significantly used » significantly reduced (Expand Search), significantly faster (Expand Search), significantly linked (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
used increases » use increased (Expand Search), ses increases (Expand Search), us1 increases (Expand Search)
alter decrease » water decreases (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), alter disease (Expand Search)
-
61
-
62
-
63
-
64
-
65
-
66
Amino acid metabolism network with intermediates with significantly altered abundances in <i>Ubi</i> > <i>bmm-RNAi</i> flies.
Published 2021“…ANOVA contrasts were used to identify metabolites that differed significantly between experimental groups and proper controls, and q-value is reported in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0255198#pone.0255198.s014" target="_blank">S1 Dataset</a>.…”
-
67
-
68
-
69
-
70
-
71
Analysis of MAF1 as a candidate predictive biomarker in HER2-positive breast cancer.
Published 2023Subjects: -
72
-
73
Clustered heatmaps for GSE129254, GSE158969, GSE15783, and GSE99060 datasets.
Published 2023Subjects: -
74
-
75
-
76
Metformin and ZLN005 facilitate increased phagocytic uptake and intracellular killing of MAB.
Published 2025Subjects: -
77
-
78
Amyloid-related measures in AD mice using MSD ELISA and immunohistochemical techniques.
Published 2023Subjects: -
79
-
80
Spatial information of excitatory neurons in APP/PS1 mice are decreased in dCA1 and vCA1.
Published 2024“…The spatial information in dCA1 was significantly larger than circularly shuffled spike trains with similar mean firing rates for C57BL/6 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.134 ± 0.050, shuffled = 0.123 ± 0.035, p < 0.005, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 229 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 22900 simulated units from 5 recording sessions), but not for APP/PS1 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.132 ± 0.054, shuffled = 0.124 ± .054, p = 0.13, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 124 units from 4 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 12400 simulated units from 4 recording sessions). …”