Search alternatives:
significantly vary » significantly larger (Expand Search), significantly worse (Expand Search), significantly less (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
vary decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
gap decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), gain decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
significantly vary » significantly larger (Expand Search), significantly worse (Expand Search), significantly less (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
vary decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
gap decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), gain decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
Linear covariate analysis of prognostically significant metabolites. Presenting the effect sizes of metabolites that showed significant differences among prognostic groups in ICU-treated COVID-19 patients....
Published 2025“…<p>Linear covariate analysis of prognostically significant metabolites. Presenting the effect sizes of metabolites that showed significant differences among prognostic groups in ICU-treated COVID-19 patients. …”
-
3
Fabric anisotropy evolution of numerical samples with different shapes and sizes.
Published 2025Subjects: -
4
Stress concentration factor value in the numerical samples with different shapes and sizes.
Published 2025Subjects: -
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
<b>Nest mass in forest tits </b><b><i>Paridae</i></b><b> </b><b>increases with elevation and decreasing body mass, promoting reproductive success</b>
Published 2025“…We found that nest mass increased by ~ 60% along the elevational gradient, but the effect of canopy openness on nest mass was not significant, while nest mass decreased along the ranked species from the smallest <i>Periparus ater</i> to the medium-sized <i>Cyanistes caeruleus</i> and the largest <i>Parus major</i>. …”
-
16
-
17
-
18
Detection effect of different sizes.
Published 2025“…Experimental results indicate that at a pruning level of 1.5, mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 improved by 3.9% and 4.6%, respectively, while computational load decreased by 21% and parameter count dropped by 53%. …”
-
19
-
20
Average stability values (mean ± standard deviation) and statistical results.
Published 2024Subjects: