Search alternatives:
significantly weaker » significantly greater (Expand Search), significantly better (Expand Search), significantly related (Expand Search)
significantly larger » significantly lower (Expand Search), significantly smaller (Expand Search), significantly higher (Expand Search)
weaker decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), water decreases (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
Showing 41 - 60 results of 635 for search '(( significantly weaker decrease ) OR ( significantly larger decrease ))', query time: 0.34s Refine Results
  1. 41
    Study-related adverse events.

    Study-related adverse events. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 42
    Study flow chart.

    Study flow chart. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 43
    Change in QIDS-SR-16 and MBI-HSS-MP by Treatment Group.

    Change in QIDS-SR-16 and MBI-HSS-MP by Treatment Group. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 44
    Study CONSORT diagram.

    Study CONSORT diagram. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 45
    Change in Demoralization Scale (DSII) by Treatment Group.

    Change in Demoralization Scale (DSII) by Treatment Group. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  6. 46
    Change in Watt’s Connectedness Scale (WCS), General Connectedness by Treatment Group.

    Change in Watt’s Connectedness Scale (WCS), General Connectedness by Treatment Group. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  7. 47
    Odds ratio (OR) for depression (HADS-D>=8) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Analyses are run using the weighted survey design on the sub-sample with non-missing for all included variables in model 6 (complete case analysis). Number of observations: N = 21,484 for all models 1-6, corresponding to the larger population size of N = 1,566,094.

    Odds ratio (OR) for depression (HADS-D>=8) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Analyses are run using the weighted survey design on the sub-sample with non-missing for all included... by Maria Lage Barca (4515385)

    Published 2025
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  8. 48
    Estimates of average yearly citations of publications by scholars accused of scientific misconduct by retraction status and time.

    Estimates of average yearly citations of publications by scholars accused of scientific misconduct by retraction status and time. by Giulia Maimone (20833354)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  9. 49
    Estimates of the average yearly citations per publication (including all publications) by scholar group, misconduct type, and time.

    Estimates of the average yearly citations per publication (including all publications) by scholar group, misconduct type, and time. by Giulia Maimone (20833354)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  10. 50
    Superimposition of the cephalometric tracings obtained before and after treatment of case with premolar tooth extraction.

    Superimposition of the cephalometric tracings obtained before and after treatment of case with premolar tooth extraction. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  11. 51
    Superimposition of the cephalometric tracings obtained before and after treatment of case with mandibular third molar extraction.

    Superimposition of the cephalometric tracings obtained before and after treatment of case with mandibular third molar extraction. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  12. 52
    Typical measurement parameters.

    Typical measurement parameters. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  13. 53
    Cephalometric measurement points.

    Cephalometric measurement points. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  14. 54
    Posttreatment facial, intraoral photographs, and radiographs of the case with premolar tooth extraction.

    Posttreatment facial, intraoral photographs, and radiographs of the case with premolar tooth extraction. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  15. 55
    Anonymized raw cephalometric data.

    Anonymized raw cephalometric data. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  16. 56
    Posttreatment facial, intraoral photographs, and radiographs of the case with mandibular third molar extraction.

    Posttreatment facial, intraoral photographs, and radiographs of the case with mandibular third molar extraction. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  17. 57
    Comparison of pretreatment cephalometric variables between premolar extraction and mandibular third molar extraction groups.

    Comparison of pretreatment cephalometric variables between premolar extraction and mandibular third molar extraction groups. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  18. 58
    Demographic characteristics of study participants.

    Demographic characteristics of study participants. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  19. 59
    Results of Analysis of Co-variance (ANCOVA) for change in parameter predicted by treatment group with pre-treatment value as a covariate. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.

    Results of Analysis of Co-variance (ANCOVA) for change in parameter predicted by treatment group with pre-treatment value as a covariate. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  20. 60
    Comparison of treatment effects between premolar extraction and mandibular third molar extraction groups. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.

    Comparison of treatment effects between premolar extraction and mandibular third molar extraction groups. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:

Search Tools: