Search alternatives:
significantly weaker » significantly greater (Expand Search), significantly better (Expand Search), significantly related (Expand Search)
significantly small » significantly smaller (Expand Search), significantly impact (Expand Search), significantly impair (Expand Search)
weaker decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), water decreases (Expand Search)
small decrease » small increased (Expand Search)
significantly weaker » significantly greater (Expand Search), significantly better (Expand Search), significantly related (Expand Search)
significantly small » significantly smaller (Expand Search), significantly impact (Expand Search), significantly impair (Expand Search)
weaker decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), water decreases (Expand Search)
small decrease » small increased (Expand Search)
-
1
The ADMET analysis of the selected compounds.
Published 2025“…RMSF analysis indicated greater flexibility in ligand-binding regions of LasI-Sulfaperin and QscR complexes, suggesting weaker binding. SASA showed a decrease in solvent-accessible surface area for the LasI-Sulfamerazine complex, supporting a compact structure. …”
-
2
AMDET profiling parameters and shorting criteria.
Published 2025“…RMSF analysis indicated greater flexibility in ligand-binding regions of LasI-Sulfaperin and QscR complexes, suggesting weaker binding. SASA showed a decrease in solvent-accessible surface area for the LasI-Sulfamerazine complex, supporting a compact structure. …”
-
3
Minimum data set used in the article.
Published 2025“…The average total phosphorus (TP) content in cropland soil was slightly higher than in forestland and significantly higher than in grassland. The weaker carbon-sequestration capacity of cropland soil resulted in notably lower C:N (10.13) and C:P (47.38) ratios compared to forestland and grassland. …”
-
4
Concentrations of C, N, and P in time change.
Published 2025“…The average total phosphorus (TP) content in cropland soil was slightly higher than in forestland and significantly higher than in grassland. The weaker carbon-sequestration capacity of cropland soil resulted in notably lower C:N (10.13) and C:P (47.38) ratios compared to forestland and grassland. …”