بدائل البحث:
significantly worse » significantly shorter (توسيع البحث), significantly larger (توسيع البحث), significantly longer (توسيع البحث)
linear decrease » linear increase (توسيع البحث)
worse decrease » we decrease (توسيع البحث)
lower decrease » larger decrease (توسيع البحث), teer decrease (توسيع البحث), we decrease (توسيع البحث)
significantly worse » significantly shorter (توسيع البحث), significantly larger (توسيع البحث), significantly longer (توسيع البحث)
linear decrease » linear increase (توسيع البحث)
worse decrease » we decrease (توسيع البحث)
lower decrease » larger decrease (توسيع البحث), teer decrease (توسيع البحث), we decrease (توسيع البحث)
-
1
Table 1_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.docx
منشور في 2025"…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
-
2
Image 5_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.png
منشور في 2025"…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
-
3
Image 9_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
منشور في 2025"…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
-
4
Image 1_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.jpeg
منشور في 2025"…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
-
5
Image 2_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
منشور في 2025"…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
-
6
Image 8_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
منشور في 2025"…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
-
7
Image 7_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
منشور في 2025"…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
-
8
Image 10_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
منشور في 2025"…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
-
9
Image 4_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
منشور في 2025"…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
-
10
Image 6_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
منشور في 2025"…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
-
11
Image 3_Unexpected estradiol decline during ovarian stimulation monitoring affects cumulative live birth.tiff
منشور في 2025"…In both unmatched and matched cohorts, the CLBRs were significantly decreased (unmatched cohort: 66.3% versus 55%, P<0.001, adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76,0.91; matched cohort: 59% versus 55%, P = 0.003, adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.75,0.94). …"
-
12
Characteristics of children in the study.
منشور في 2025"…</p><p>Conclusions:</p><p>This study found a significant association between myopia and worse HRQOL in primary and secondary school children. …"