Search alternatives:
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
961
Binomial logistic regression odds ratios of all patient, CDT, and outcome variables (n = 5,962).
Published 2023Subjects: -
962
-
963
-
964
-
965
-
966
-
967
-
968
-
969
-
970
-
971
-
972
-
973
-
974
-
975
-
976
-
977
-
978
-
979
<i>X</i> and <i>4</i><sup><i><sup>th</sup></i></sup> chromosome nondisjunction frequency.
Published 2025“…However, the placement of crossovers was altered, displaying an increase in frequency in the centromere-proximal euchromatin indicating a decrease in the centromere effect, similar to that observed in <i><i>D. mauritiana</i></i> females. …”
-
980
Flowchart of the selection program.
Published 2024“…Body size, body composition, and maturity had a significant, but of moderate power, effect on the selection. Larger body height increased the likelihood of selection by about 12%, larger muscle mass by 12% to 25%, larger bone age by 350–400%, while larger percent body fat decreased selection chances by 7%. …”