Differential genome-wide distribution of epigenetic markers between HCV infected vs. non-infected cells and its integration with gene expression. by Shira Perez (6857819)

“…<p>(A) Change in genome-wide distribution of epigenetic marks following HCV infection (100% HCV infected Huh7.5 cells, generated as described in the <a href="http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008181#sec010" target="_blank">Methods</a>) determined by ChIP-seq experiments, as well as change in gene expression determined by RNA-seq experiment. …”

Prostaglandin E2 potentiation of P2X3 receptor mediated currents in dorsal root ganglion neurons-5 by Congying Wang (81505)

“…However, co-injection of α,β-meATP and PGE2 produced a much larger decrease in the threshold [1-(meATP+PGE)/Con = 0.65 ± 0.07, n = 3] than adding the threshold reduction produced by α,β-meATP and by PGE2. …”

Combined Experimental and Computational Studies on Carbon−Carbon Reductive Elimination from Bis(hydrocarbyl) Complexes of (PCP)Ir by Rajshekhar Ghosh (1812388)

“…For R/R′ = Ph/Ph, Ph/Me, and Ph/CCPh, we obtain upper limits to the elimination rate; and for R/R′ = CCPh/CCPh, a lower limit. …”

Combined Experimental and Computational Studies on Carbon−Carbon Reductive Elimination from Bis(hydrocarbyl) Complexes of (PCP)Ir by Rajshekhar Ghosh (1812388)

“…For R/R′ = Ph/Ph, Ph/Me, and Ph/CCPh, we obtain upper limits to the elimination rate; and for R/R′ = CCPh/CCPh, a lower limit. …”

Combined Experimental and Computational Studies on Carbon−Carbon Reductive Elimination from Bis(hydrocarbyl) Complexes of (PCP)Ir by Rajshekhar Ghosh (1812388)

“…For R/R′ = Ph/Ph, Ph/Me, and Ph/CCPh, we obtain upper limits to the elimination rate; and for R/R′ = CCPh/CCPh, a lower limit. …”

Combined Experimental and Computational Studies on Carbon−Carbon Reductive Elimination from Bis(hydrocarbyl) Complexes of (PCP)Ir by Rajshekhar Ghosh (1812388)

“…For R/R′ = Ph/Ph, Ph/Me, and Ph/CCPh, we obtain upper limits to the elimination rate; and for R/R′ = CCPh/CCPh, a lower limit. …”

Combined Experimental and Computational Studies on Carbon−Carbon Reductive Elimination from Bis(hydrocarbyl) Complexes of (PCP)Ir by Rajshekhar Ghosh (1812388)

“…For R/R′ = Ph/Ph, Ph/Me, and Ph/CCPh, we obtain upper limits to the elimination rate; and for R/R′ = CCPh/CCPh, a lower limit. …”

Combined Experimental and Computational Studies on Carbon−Carbon Reductive Elimination from Bis(hydrocarbyl) Complexes of (PCP)Ir by Rajshekhar Ghosh (1812388)

“…For R/R′ = Ph/Ph, Ph/Me, and Ph/CCPh, we obtain upper limits to the elimination rate; and for R/R′ = CCPh/CCPh, a lower limit. …”

Combined Experimental and Computational Studies on Carbon−Carbon Reductive Elimination from Bis(hydrocarbyl) Complexes of (PCP)Ir by Rajshekhar Ghosh (1812388)

“…For R/R′ = Ph/Ph, Ph/Me, and Ph/CCPh, we obtain upper limits to the elimination rate; and for R/R′ = CCPh/CCPh, a lower limit. …”

Combined Experimental and Computational Studies on Carbon−Carbon Reductive Elimination from Bis(hydrocarbyl) Complexes of (PCP)Ir by Rajshekhar Ghosh (1812388)

“…For R/R′ = Ph/Ph, Ph/Me, and Ph/CCPh, we obtain upper limits to the elimination rate; and for R/R′ = CCPh/CCPh, a lower limit. …”

Combined Experimental and Computational Studies on Carbon−Carbon Reductive Elimination from Bis(hydrocarbyl) Complexes of (PCP)Ir by Rajshekhar Ghosh (1812388)

“…For R/R′ = Ph/Ph, Ph/Me, and Ph/CCPh, we obtain upper limits to the elimination rate; and for R/R′ = CCPh/CCPh, a lower limit. …”

Combined Experimental and Computational Studies on Carbon−Carbon Reductive Elimination from Bis(hydrocarbyl) Complexes of (PCP)Ir by Rajshekhar Ghosh (1812388)

“…For R/R′ = Ph/Ph, Ph/Me, and Ph/CCPh, we obtain upper limits to the elimination rate; and for R/R′ = CCPh/CCPh, a lower limit. …”

Combined Experimental and Computational Studies on Carbon−Carbon Reductive Elimination from Bis(hydrocarbyl) Complexes of (PCP)Ir by Rajshekhar Ghosh (1812388)

“…For R/R′ = Ph/Ph, Ph/Me, and Ph/CCPh, we obtain upper limits to the elimination rate; and for R/R′ = CCPh/CCPh, a lower limit. …”

Ultrasound microbubble potentiated enhancement of hyperthermia-effect in tumours - Fig 6 by Deepa Sharma (278210)

“…Scale bar: 50 μm (B) Quantification of Ki-67 images indicates that exposure of xenografted tumors to combined treatment of USMB and hyperthermia resulted in a larger decrease in Ki-67 labeling indices compared to USMB alone or hyperthermia only (n = 3–5). …”

Supplemental Figure S5 from <i>KRAS</i> Genomic Status Predicts the Sensitivity of Ovarian Cancer Cells to Decitabine by Michelle L. Stewart (14919018)

“…<p>A, quantification of western blot analysis for phosphorylation of MEK and ERK after treatment with decitabine for six days in a KRAS-mutant (MCAS) and KRAS-wild type (RMGI) ovarian cancer cell line as depicted in the main text. …”

Smaller significant network modules: network diagrams. by Thomas E. Bartlett (433733)

“…(f) Largest biologically significant subnetwork in the BRCA data set. …”

Data_Sheet_2_Putative Concussion Biomarkers Identified in Adolescent Male Athletes Using Targeted Plasma Proteomics.PDF by Michael R. Miller (375187)

“…Proximity extension assays were performed for 1,472 plasma proteins; a total of six proteins were considered significantly different between cohorts (P < 0.01; five proteins decreased and one protein increased). …”

Reaching endpoints for lymphatic filariasis elimination- results from mass drug administration and nocturnal blood surveys, South Gujarat, India by Anjali Modi (3900520)

“…The current strategy to interrupt transmission of LF, is administration of once-yearly, single-dose, two-drug regimen (Albendazole with Diethylcarbamazine (DEC) to be used in endemic areas with the goal of reaching 65% epidemiological coverage for 4–6 years. We report findings of independent assessment from year 2010 to 2015 for last six rounds, after initial five rounds of Mass Drug Administration (MDA) since 2005 for ELF in endemic area of Gujarat.…”

Nanotribological Properties of the h‑BN/Au(111) Interface: A DFT Study by Merve Baksi (7831742)

“…The friction coefficient falls rapidly with increasing load down to 0.005 for the largest loads considered. In contrast, Au_<i>n</i> clusters (<i>n</i> = 1, 4, 13, and 19) sliding on the h-BN surface exhibit much larger lateral forces, indicating strong size and edge effects. …”

The effects of dynamin GTPase mutants on the kinetics of actin recruitment. by Marcus J. Taylor (173337)

“…Co-expression of dyn1(T65A)-HA (green, six cells, 797 events), the most potent GTPase mutant tested, led to a marked decrease in the slope of lifeact-mCherry recruitment compared to cells co-expressing dyn1(WT)-HA (blue) (G,H). …”