Search alternatives:
system decrease » step decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
large decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
system decrease » step decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
large decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
Repetitive stress induces a decrease in sound-evoked activity.
Published 2025“…The reduction in activity was particularly striking at moderate sound intensities (mean ± SE, 1-way ANOVA, F = 14.24, <i>p</i> = 1.0 × 10<sup>−13</sup> and <i>t</i> test for each level: 20 dB <i>p</i> = 8.4 × 10<sup>−05</sup>, 30 dB <i>p</i> = 1, 40 dB <i>p</i> = 0.350 dB <i>p</i> = 4.9 × 10<sup>−12</sup>, 60 dB <i>p</i> = 2.4 × 10<sup>−15</sup>, 70 dB <i>p</i> = 1.5 × 10<sup>−05</sup> all corrected for multiple comparisons. …”
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
Dynamic system state in demand scenarios 2.
Published 2025“…Numerical experiments using actual survey data from Kunshan City yield several noteworthy findings: (1) An optimal moderate-sized time step exists for rolling optimization to minimize either the average delay time or total costs; specifically, an excessively small time step may increase vehicle average delay time or total costs; (2) The percentage of delay reduction achieved by our method, compared to Synchro software, reaches a maximum of approximately 70% when traffic demand is moderate and the initial state is low; and (3) The percentage reduction in average delay or total costs compared to Synchro initially increases and then decreases with rising traffic intensity.…”
-
20
Dynamic system state in demand scenarios 3.
Published 2025“…Numerical experiments using actual survey data from Kunshan City yield several noteworthy findings: (1) An optimal moderate-sized time step exists for rolling optimization to minimize either the average delay time or total costs; specifically, an excessively small time step may increase vehicle average delay time or total costs; (2) The percentage of delay reduction achieved by our method, compared to Synchro software, reaches a maximum of approximately 70% when traffic demand is moderate and the initial state is low; and (3) The percentage reduction in average delay or total costs compared to Synchro initially increases and then decreases with rising traffic intensity.…”