Search alternatives:
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
large decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
may decrease » may increase (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
large decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
may decrease » may increase (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
The introduction of mutualisms into assembled communities increases their connectance and complexity while decreasing their richness.
Published 2025“…When they stop being introduced in further assembly events (i.e. introduced species do not carry any mutualistic interactions), their proportion slowly decreases with successive invasions. (B) Even though higher proportions of mutualism promote higher richness, introducing this type of interaction into already assembled large communities promotes a sudden drop in richness, while stopping mutualism promotes a slight boost in richness increase. …”
-
15
Data Sheet 1_Decreased cigarette smoking may partially explain the increased prevalence of antinuclear antibodies in the United States.pdf
Published 2025“…</p>Discussion<p>Although smoking causes harmful health effects, ANA data are consistent with smoking playing a role in decreasing autoimmunity. Recent vaping among adolescents may partially explain their large increase in ANA prevalence. …”
-
16
-
17
Table 1_Effect of decreased suspended sediment content on chlorophyll-a in Dongting Lake, China.docx
Published 2025“…The reduction in SSC may influence chlorophyll-a (Chl-a) concentrations in water, thereby further affecting the aquatic ecological environment. …”
-
18
Baseline patient characteristics.
Published 2025“…In contrast, s-ketamine largely preserved respiratory variability, suggesting it may be a safer alternative for sedation in patients with impaired spontaneous breathing. …”
-
19
Modelled policy outcomes, with posterior values for individual nodes ranked from 1-5 across the parties - Green, Reform UK, Liberal Democrat, Conservative, and Labour, where 1 is the lowest rank and 5 is the highest. The parties are ranked for each policy node in the network (e.g., income tax), based on the direction of change (“performance indicator”) stated in the first column (e.g., lowest, highest, most, improvement). For example, a value of 5 for Green tax means that green tax is lowest under Reform UK’s policies, while a value of 1 means that green tax is highest under the Green Party’s policies. Larger text in bold and italic font indicates that the directional change (i.e., increase or decrease) of a node under a party’s policies is consistent with the direction indicated, whereas black text indicates an opposite directional change (e.g., income tax is predicted to decrease under Reform UK in alignment with the performance indicator, and increase under Green and Labour).
Published 2025“…Larger text in bold and italic font indicates that the directional change (i.e., increase or decrease) of a node under a party’s policies is consistent with the direction indicated, whereas black text indicates an opposite directional change (e.g., income tax is predicted to decrease under Reform UK in alignment with the performance indicator, and increase under Green and Labour).…”
-
20