Showing 1 - 20 results of 10,187 for search '(( study ((site decrease) OR (we decrease)) ) OR ( a ((larger decrease) OR (marked decrease)) ))', query time: 0.57s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6

    S1 File - by Ingmar Lundquist (46422)

    Published 2025
    Subjects:
  7. 7

    Characterizations of the three study sites. by Anja Bergmann (14188439)

    Published 2025
    “…To evaluate this, we placed 30 modified boxes and 30 unmodified boxes across three forest areas in Northern Germany, each differing in proximity to known bat hibernation sites and the prior presence of artificial roosts. …”
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10

    The reagents used in this study. by Tucker Hopkins (20790529)

    Published 2025
    “…Furthermore, when S2R + <i>Drosophila</i> cells are incubated at high temperatures, there is a marked decrease in Akt phosphorylation, directly supporting the notion that elevated temperatures can inhibit insulin signaling in a cell-autonomous manner, independent of Ilp levels. …”
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14

    Study flow chart. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  15. 15

    Study CONSORT diagram. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  16. 16

    Study-related adverse events. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20