Search alternatives:
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
large decrease » large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
1 decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
study 1 » study _ (Expand Search), study 2 (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
large decrease » large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
1 decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
study 1 » study _ (Expand Search), study 2 (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
(A) Auxiliary marking points to ensure complete and accurate seating of the prosthesis.
Published 2025Subjects: -
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
Table 1_Effect of decreased suspended sediment content on chlorophyll-a in Dongting Lake, China.docx
Published 2025“…The reduction in SSC may influence chlorophyll-a (Chl-a) concentrations in water, thereby further affecting the aquatic ecological environment. …”
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
Group-level narrow- and broad-band spectral changes after hemispherotomy reveal a marked EEG slowing of the isolated cortex, robust across patients.
Published 2025“…This decrease was larger in the disconnected than in the contralateral cortex. …”
-
17
The introduction of mutualisms into assembled communities increases their connectance and complexity while decreasing their richness.
Published 2025“…When they stop being introduced in further assembly events (i.e. introduced species do not carry any mutualistic interactions), their proportion slowly decreases with successive invasions. (B) Even though higher proportions of mutualism promote higher richness, introducing this type of interaction into already assembled large communities promotes a sudden drop in richness, while stopping mutualism promotes a slight boost in richness increase. …”
-
18
-
19
-
20
Repetitive stress induces a decrease in sound-evoked activity.
Published 2025“…These mice exhibited a minimal change in noise-evoked PPy activity when comparing the first and second week of imaging (2-way ANOVA, F = 1.79, <i>p</i> = 0.11, post hoc baseline w1 50 dB: baseline w2 50 dB <i>p</i> = 1 Bonferroni corrected, nested ANOVA (mouse nested within session) F = 1.76, <i>p</i> = 0.12, mean ± SE). …”