Search alternatives:
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
study method » study methods (Expand Search), study met (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
study method » study methods (Expand Search), study met (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
(A) Auxiliary marking points to ensure complete and accurate seating of the prosthesis.
Published 2025Subjects: -
5
-
6
-
7
Table 1_The impact of decreased prognostic nutritional index on the prognosis of patients with pneumonia treated with glucocorticoids: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.docx
Published 2025“…Multivariable Cox regression showed that, after full adjustment for potential confounders, every 2-unit decrease in PNI was associated with a 10% higher 30-day mortality hazard (HR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.05–1.15, p < 0.001) and a 9% higher 90-day mortality hazard (HR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.04–1.14, p < 0.001). …”
-
8
Image 1_The impact of decreased prognostic nutritional index on the prognosis of patients with pneumonia treated with glucocorticoids: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.tif
Published 2025“…Multivariable Cox regression showed that, after full adjustment for potential confounders, every 2-unit decrease in PNI was associated with a 10% higher 30-day mortality hazard (HR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.05–1.15, p < 0.001) and a 9% higher 90-day mortality hazard (HR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.04–1.14, p < 0.001). …”
-
9
-
10
Methods used to extract shoreline changes.
Published 2025“…Compared to 1930, the water level decreased by 2.6 m by 2023, with 1935 marking the onset of a significant downward trend. …”
-
11
Data Sheet 1_Persistent lymphopenia after kidney transplantation: increased mortality and decreased homeostatic mechanisms.docx
Published 2025“…</p>Methods<p>We retrospectively studied peripheral blood lymphocyte and leukocyte counts in 7307 adult, solitary renal transplant recipients transplanted between 1/2006 to 12/2020. …”
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
Table 2_The impact of decreased prognostic nutritional index on the prognosis of patients with pneumonia treated with glucocorticoids: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.docx
Published 2025“…Multivariable Cox regression showed that, after full adjustment for potential confounders, every 2-unit decrease in PNI was associated with a 10% higher 30-day mortality hazard (HR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.05–1.15, p < 0.001) and a 9% higher 90-day mortality hazard (HR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.04–1.14, p < 0.001). …”
-
16
Table 3_The impact of decreased prognostic nutritional index on the prognosis of patients with pneumonia treated with glucocorticoids: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.docx
Published 2025“…Multivariable Cox regression showed that, after full adjustment for potential confounders, every 2-unit decrease in PNI was associated with a 10% higher 30-day mortality hazard (HR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.05–1.15, p < 0.001) and a 9% higher 90-day mortality hazard (HR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.04–1.14, p < 0.001). …”
-
17
Table 5_The impact of decreased prognostic nutritional index on the prognosis of patients with pneumonia treated with glucocorticoids: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.docx
Published 2025“…Multivariable Cox regression showed that, after full adjustment for potential confounders, every 2-unit decrease in PNI was associated with a 10% higher 30-day mortality hazard (HR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.05–1.15, p < 0.001) and a 9% higher 90-day mortality hazard (HR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.04–1.14, p < 0.001). …”
-
18
Table 4_The impact of decreased prognostic nutritional index on the prognosis of patients with pneumonia treated with glucocorticoids: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.docx
Published 2025“…Multivariable Cox regression showed that, after full adjustment for potential confounders, every 2-unit decrease in PNI was associated with a 10% higher 30-day mortality hazard (HR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.05–1.15, p < 0.001) and a 9% higher 90-day mortality hazard (HR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.04–1.14, p < 0.001). …”
-
19
-
20
Study flow chart.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”