Search alternatives:
posits decrease » visits decreased (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), costs decreased (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
large decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
study posits » study points (Expand Search), study visits (Expand Search), study sites (Expand Search)
posits decrease » visits decreased (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), costs decreased (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
large decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
study posits » study points (Expand Search), study visits (Expand Search), study sites (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
Table 1_Effect of decreased suspended sediment content on chlorophyll-a in Dongting Lake, China.docx
Published 2025“…However, the effect of reduced SSC on Chl-a is poorly studied. Here, we compared and analyzed the distribution conditions of Chl-a in 6 representative years for both before the implementation of Three Gorges Dam (TGD) (BIT) and after the implementation of TGD (AIT), using the TM/OLI data and NIR-red inversion model. …”
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
Linear covariate analysis of prognostically significant metabolites. Presenting the effect sizes of metabolites that showed significant differences among prognostic groups in ICU-treated COVID-19 patients. Metabolites were included based on an F-value > 2.5 and a p-value < 0.05. Metabolites marked with a single asterisk (*) were significant in both two-way ANOVA and ASCA, whereas those marked with double asterisks (**) were significant only in two-way ANOVA....
Published 2025“…Metabolites were included based on an F-value > 2.5 and a p-value < 0.05. Metabolites marked with a single asterisk (*) were significant in both two-way ANOVA and ASCA, whereas those marked with double asterisks (**) were significant only in two-way ANOVA. …”
-
17
-
18
Survival of soft-shell clams with MarBTN compared to control clams.
Published 2025“…(<i>B</i>) Analysis of long-term non-progressing clams (n = 11, light red line), along with their respective paired controls (blue line), shows no difference in survival with maintained low-level infection. (C) A sub-analysis of low-positive clams in which MarBTN progressed and did not regress (n = 9, dark red line), with survival starting at the time the clam was detected with >10% cancer, compared with their paired control clams starting at the same date (blue line), shows a significant decrease in time-to death. “+” marks the dates at which two negative control animals were culled before natural death (these events were censored in the survival analysis).…”
-
19
MarBTN-specific eDNA detection in each clam that was followed for MarBTN in hemolymph and eDNA.
Published 2025“…The animal with clear regression is FFM-21A1. In a second clam (FFM-22H11), the cancer decreased but it did not survive more than 8 weeks after this drop, so under our conservative criteria, we consider it to be progression. …”
-
20