Search alternatives:
largest decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
using decrease » point decrease (Expand Search), coping decreased (Expand Search)
largest decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
using decrease » point decrease (Expand Search), coping decreased (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
Table_2_Maternal oral probiotic use is associated with decreased breastmilk inflammatory markers, infant fecal microbiome variation, and altered recognition memory responses in infants—a pilot observational study.XLSX
Published 2024“…Introduction<p>Early life gut microbiomes are important for brain and immune system development in animal models. Probiotic use has been proposed as a strategy to promote health via modulation of microbiomes. …”
-
6
Table_1_Maternal oral probiotic use is associated with decreased breastmilk inflammatory markers, infant fecal microbiome variation, and altered recognition memory responses in infants—a pilot observational study.XLSX
Published 2024“…Introduction<p>Early life gut microbiomes are important for brain and immune system development in animal models. Probiotic use has been proposed as a strategy to promote health via modulation of microbiomes. …”
-
7
-
8
Parameters used in the simulations.
Published 2025“…<div><p>Particle morphology and size are fundamental characteristics that significantly influence the mechanical behavior of granular materials. This study introduces key parameters—aspect ratio (Ω), sphericity (S), and equivalent diameter (Dₑ)—into a modified Hertz-based contact model to conduct a multiscale study using contact mechanics theory and the discrete element method (DEM). …”
-
9
-
10
Trust change by gender.
Published 2025“…Results indicate that respondnatds from North America and Europe Experienced an increase in trust where as Africa and South America Witnessed a decline in trust. Males exhibited a greater decline in trust than females (p = 0.038), and undergraduate degree holders showed the largest decrease (p = 0.001). …”
-
11
Trust change by age group.
Published 2025“…Results indicate that respondnatds from North America and Europe Experienced an increase in trust where as Africa and South America Witnessed a decline in trust. Males exhibited a greater decline in trust than females (p = 0.038), and undergraduate degree holders showed the largest decrease (p = 0.001). …”
-
12
Trust change by education level.
Published 2025“…Results indicate that respondnatds from North America and Europe Experienced an increase in trust where as Africa and South America Witnessed a decline in trust. Males exhibited a greater decline in trust than females (p = 0.038), and undergraduate degree holders showed the largest decrease (p = 0.001). …”
-
13
Trust change by source of science information.
Published 2025“…Results indicate that respondnatds from North America and Europe Experienced an increase in trust where as Africa and South America Witnessed a decline in trust. Males exhibited a greater decline in trust than females (p = 0.038), and undergraduate degree holders showed the largest decrease (p = 0.001). …”
-
14
-
15
Affordability calculation using actual consumption estimates (ConsumptionRIP).
Published 2024Subjects: -
16
Study flow chart.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
17
Study CONSORT diagram.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
18
-
19
-
20
Study-related adverse events.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”