Search alternatives:
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
max decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
max decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1
Graph for Max Amplitude/Length at G<sub>y</sub> = 0.
Published 2025“…The smoothest cylinder (K<sub>s</sub>/D = ) produced the highest power (52.325 µW), while the roughest (K<sub>s</sub>/D = ) resulted in a 6.26% decrease in power (36.4 µW), along with reductions of 4.5% in flapping frequency and 20% in amplitude. …”
-
2
Evogliptin attenuates the phenotypic switch of VSMCs during CER treatment by decreasing the osteogenesis-associated genes <i>in-vitro.</i>
Published 2025“…(B, C) Summarized bar graph showed EVO significantly decreased calcium deposition and calcium content in CER treated P<sub>i</sub>-induced VSMCs. …”
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
Evogliptin attenuates the pyroptotic cell death of VSMCs during CER treatment by decreasing the pyroptotic-associated genes and GSDM-D cleavage efficiency <i>in-vitro.</i>
Published 2025“…<p>(A) Bar graph showed EVO significantly decreased Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release in CER treated P<sub>i</sub>‐induced VSMCs. …”
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
Contribution of the through-mask leakages from the cavity and channel network distributed along the periphery of the mask; a–c and d–f are decreasing porosity <i>c</i><sub><i>k</i></sub> = 100,500,1000 (<i>kg</i>/<i>m</i><sup>2</sup> <i>s</i>) for outward protection (with nose clips) and inward protection model, respectively; the <i>k</i><sub><i>L</i></sub> for inward protection model is 0.5.
Published 2025“…<p>Contribution of the through-mask leakages from the cavity and channel network distributed along the periphery of the mask; a–c and d–f are decreasing porosity <i>c</i><sub><i>k</i></sub> = 100,500,1000 (<i>kg</i>/<i>m</i><sup>2</sup> <i>s</i>) for outward protection (with nose clips) and inward protection model, respectively; the <i>k</i><sub><i>L</i></sub> for inward protection model is 0.5.…”
-
20