Search alternatives:
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
4 decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search)
target 4 » target _ (Expand Search), target 6 (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
4 decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search)
target 4 » target _ (Expand Search), target 6 (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
S1 File -
Published 2025“…Following the overexpression of miRNA 221 in myocardium, there was a marked alleviation of myocardial injury and cardiomyocyte apoptosis and necrosis, significant enhancement of left ventricular systolic function, and marked decrease in the levels of PLB, p-PLB (Ser16), p-PLB (Thr17), caspase 3 and Cyt C, as well as a significant decrease in total calcium levels in myocardium.…”
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
The heart rate was similar among the groups.
Published 2025“…Following the overexpression of miRNA 221 in myocardium, there was a marked alleviation of myocardial injury and cardiomyocyte apoptosis and necrosis, significant enhancement of left ventricular systolic function, and marked decrease in the levels of PLB, p-PLB (Ser16), p-PLB (Thr17), caspase 3 and Cyt C, as well as a significant decrease in total calcium levels in myocardium.…”
-
13
Primer sequences for RT-qPCR.
Published 2025“…Following the overexpression of miRNA 221 in myocardium, there was a marked alleviation of myocardial injury and cardiomyocyte apoptosis and necrosis, significant enhancement of left ventricular systolic function, and marked decrease in the levels of PLB, p-PLB (Ser16), p-PLB (Thr17), caspase 3 and Cyt C, as well as a significant decrease in total calcium levels in myocardium.…”
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
(A) Auxiliary marking points to ensure complete and accurate seating of the prosthesis.
Published 2025Subjects: -
18
Repetitive stress induces a decrease in sound-evoked activity.
Published 2025“…Activity rates decreased during repeated stress compared to baseline (2-way ANOVA, condition F = 185.6, <i>p</i> = 4.8 × 10<sup>−42</sup>, condition: intensity interaction F = 10.37, <i>p</i> = 9.3 × 10<sup>−21</sup>, nested ANOVA (mouse nested within session), condition F = 174, <i>p</i> = 1.5 × 10<sup>−39</sup>, condition: intensity interaction F = 12.7, <i>p</i> = 2 × 10<sup>−26</sup>, post hoc for each level baseline versus repetitive stress <i>p</i> < 0.01 for all levels above 50 dB, all Bonferroni corrected). …”
-
19
-
20