Candidates from the RF method. The top 25 random forest candidates ranked by mean decrease in accuracy and mean decrease in Gini Index are in the first and second columns, respectively.... by Zoë Parker Cates (22184243)

“…The top 25 random forest candidates ranked by mean decrease in accuracy and mean decrease in Gini Index are in the first and second columns, respectively. …”

Mean 0-30 m sprint times for TSG, VBT, and CG groups at pre-test and post-test (with 95% CI). by Murat Tutar (22250461)

Mean 0-20 m sprint times for TSG, VBT, and CG groups at pre-test and post-test (with 95% CI). by Murat Tutar (22250461)

Mean 0-10 m sprint times for TSG, VBT, and CG groups at pre-test and post-test (with 95% CI). by Murat Tutar (22250461)

Intraoperative facial and intraoral photographs of the case with mandibular third molar extraction. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

Time course of central retinal thickness (CRT) in recurrence and non-recurrence groups. by Yasuyuki Sotani (20114144)

“…<p>In the recurrence group, CRT (μm ± standard deviation) significantly decreased from 546.1 ± 117.0 μm preoperatively to 317.1 ± 46.9, 317.8 ± 55.6, 290.8 ± 33.5, 342.9 ± 82.2, 333.0 ± 84.2, and 349.8 ± 76.9 μm at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively (Kruskal-Wallis test, P < 0.001; Dunn’s test, **P < 0.01). …”

Posttreatment facial, intraoral photographs, and radiographs of the case with mandibular third molar extraction. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

Pretreatment facial, intraoral photographs, and radiographs of the case with mandibular third molar extraction. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

Mean responses to the Oxford Utilitarianism Scale and its subscales. by Aistė Ambrasė (22505574)

Subjects:

Superimposition of the cephalometric tracings obtained before and after treatment of case with mandibular third molar extraction. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

Comparison of pretreatment cephalometric variables between premolar extraction and mandibular third molar extraction groups. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

Laser-Enhanced Bubble Detachment Velocity and Heat Dissipation on Abrasive Surfaces by Cong He (5074154)

“…It was discovered that the bubble detachment velocity initially increases and subsequently decreases with increasing laser power density, while a reduction in surface roughness can enhance the detachment velocity. …”

Laser-Enhanced Bubble Detachment Velocity and Heat Dissipation on Abrasive Surfaces by Cong He (5074154)

“…It was discovered that the bubble detachment velocity initially increases and subsequently decreases with increasing laser power density, while a reduction in surface roughness can enhance the detachment velocity. …”

Laser-Enhanced Bubble Detachment Velocity and Heat Dissipation on Abrasive Surfaces by Cong He (5074154)

“…It was discovered that the bubble detachment velocity initially increases and subsequently decreases with increasing laser power density, while a reduction in surface roughness can enhance the detachment velocity. …”

Laser-Enhanced Bubble Detachment Velocity and Heat Dissipation on Abrasive Surfaces by Cong He (5074154)

“…It was discovered that the bubble detachment velocity initially increases and subsequently decreases with increasing laser power density, while a reduction in surface roughness can enhance the detachment velocity. …”

Laser-Enhanced Bubble Detachment Velocity and Heat Dissipation on Abrasive Surfaces by Cong He (5074154)

“…It was discovered that the bubble detachment velocity initially increases and subsequently decreases with increasing laser power density, while a reduction in surface roughness can enhance the detachment velocity. …”

Comparison of upper and lower arch crowding between premolar extraction group and the mandibular third molar extraction groups. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

Particle size distribution curve (a) and XRD pattern (b) of standard siliceous sand. Particle size distribution of the standard siliceous sand was measured using a laser particle s... by Liang Xiong (1426411)

Individual and mean EQ-5D VAS scores in the PP-group (0 = baseline, 1 = after the first day of treatment, 2 = after the second day of treatment, 3 = after the third day of treatmen... by Marcus Persson (20496333)

Comparison of treatment effects between premolar extraction and mandibular third molar extraction groups. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01. by Lijuan Liu (136685)