Showing 1 - 20 results of 1,019 for search '(( third ((((age decrease) OR (marked decrease))) OR (mean decrease)) ) OR ( a step decrease ))', query time: 0.60s Refine Results
  1. 1

    Effective contact rate over time for the different modelling scenarios considered: fixed, continuously increasing, continuously decreasing and with a step-decrease. by Joshua Looker (21390948)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>Effective contact rate over time for the different modelling scenarios considered: fixed, continuously increasing, continuously decreasing and with a step-decrease.</p>…”
  2. 2
  3. 3

    Participants enrollment. by Chikondi Maluwa (20660522)

    Published 2025
    “…Among the 422 caregivers who participated in the study, 267 (63.2%) were females and mean age was 44.94 years. The baseline mean knowledge level score was 9.5 (38.0%) and rose to 21.08 (84.3%) p = 0.000 immediate post-health education and a 2.1% decrease 20.54 (82.2%) p<0.001 at week six from the immediate post health education score. …”
  4. 4

    KAP assessment scores (n = 422). by Chikondi Maluwa (20660522)

    Published 2025
    “…Among the 422 caregivers who participated in the study, 267 (63.2%) were females and mean age was 44.94 years. The baseline mean knowledge level score was 9.5 (38.0%) and rose to 21.08 (84.3%) p = 0.000 immediate post-health education and a 2.1% decrease 20.54 (82.2%) p<0.001 at week six from the immediate post health education score. …”
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12

    Annual treatment frequencies in all eyes. by Yasuyuki Sotani (20114144)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>The number of anti-VEGF treatments, STTA, MA-PC, PPV, and total treatments (mean ± SD) significantly decreased from 2.6 ± 1.6, 0.3 ± 0.8, 0.6 ± 0.8, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 3.7 ± 1.7 preoperatively to 0.8 ± 1.9, 0.0 ± 0.2, 0.3 ± 1.0, 0.0, and 1.2 ± 2.2; at year 2 to 0.7 ± 2.0, 0.1 ± 0.6, 0.0 ± 0.2, 0.0 ± 0.2, and 1.0 ± 2.1; and at year 3 to 0.9 ± 2.2, 0.0, 0.2 ± 1.0, 0.0 ± 0.2, and 1.1 ± 3.1 (Kruskal–Wallis test, P < 0.001; Dunn’s test, **P < 0.01). …”
  13. 13

    Annual number of outpatient visits in all eyes. by Yasuyuki Sotani (20114144)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>Mean visit frequency (mean ± standard deviation) significantly decreased from 11.5 ± 4.3 preoperatively to 8.8 ± 4.1, 5.0 ± 3.4, and 4.4 ± 3.2 visits in the first, second, and third postoperative years, respectively (Kruskal–Wallis test, P < 0.001; Dunn’s test, **P < 0.01). …”
  14. 14

    Time course of central retinal thickness (CRT) in recurrence and non-recurrence groups. by Yasuyuki Sotani (20114144)

    Published 2025
    “…These values significantly decreased in the first postoperative year to 2.3 ± 2.6, 0.1 ± 0.3, 0.8 ± 1.6, 0, and 3.1 ± 2.8; in the second year to 2.1 ± 2.8, 0.4 ± 1.0, 0.0, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 2.6 ± 2.8; and in the third year to 2.0 ± 2.2, 0, 0.6 ± 1.7, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 2.8 ± 3.5 (Kruskal–Wallis test, p < 0.001; <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0332941#pone.0332941.g007" target="_blank">Fig 7</a>). …”
  15. 15

    Annual treatment frequencies in recurrence and non-recurrence groups. by Yasuyuki Sotani (20114144)

    Published 2025
    “…These significantly decreased to 2.3 ± 2.6, 0.1 ± 0.3, 0.8 ± 1.6, 0.0, and 3.1 ± 2.8 in the first year; 2.1 ± 2.8, 0.4 ± 1.0, 0, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 2.6 ± 2.8 in the second year; and 2.0 ± 2.2, 0, 0.6 ± 1.7, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 2.8 ± 3.5 in the third year (Kruskal–Wallis test, p < 0.001; Dunn’s test, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01). …”
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19

    Table of step height. by Jianbo Jia (717814)

    Published 2024
    “…The simulation results show that for steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height, the optimal polyline angle is concentrated in the range of 10°-11°, in which the Angle of 10.5° has a good performance against the steps of three heights. …”
  20. 20

    The well wall step. by Jianbo Jia (717814)

    Published 2024
    “…The simulation results show that for steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height, the optimal polyline angle is concentrated in the range of 10°-11°, in which the Angle of 10.5° has a good performance against the steps of three heights. …”