Search alternatives:
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreasing (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreasing (Expand Search)
-
1
Intraoperative facial and intraoral photographs of the case with mandibular third molar extraction.
Published 2025Subjects: -
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
Candidates from the RF method. The top 25 random forest candidates ranked by mean decrease in accuracy and mean decrease in Gini Index are in the first and second columns, respectively....
Published 2025“…The top 25 random forest candidates ranked by mean decrease in accuracy and mean decrease in Gini Index are in the first and second columns, respectively. …”
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
Mean 0-30 m sprint times for TSG, VBT, and CG groups at pre-test and post-test (with 95% CI).
Published 2025Subjects: -
13
Mean 0-20 m sprint times for TSG, VBT, and CG groups at pre-test and post-test (with 95% CI).
Published 2025Subjects: -
14
Mean 0-10 m sprint times for TSG, VBT, and CG groups at pre-test and post-test (with 95% CI).
Published 2025Subjects: -
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
Time course of central retinal thickness (CRT) in recurrence and non-recurrence groups.
Published 2025“…These values significantly decreased in the first postoperative year to 2.3 ± 2.6, 0.1 ± 0.3, 0.8 ± 1.6, 0, and 3.1 ± 2.8; in the second year to 2.1 ± 2.8, 0.4 ± 1.0, 0.0, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 2.6 ± 2.8; and in the third year to 2.0 ± 2.2, 0, 0.6 ± 1.7, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 2.8 ± 3.5 (Kruskal–Wallis test, p < 0.001; <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0332941#pone.0332941.g007" target="_blank">Fig 7</a>). …”
-
20
Annual treatment frequencies in recurrence and non-recurrence groups.
Published 2025“…<p>In the recurrence group, the respective treatment counts for anti-VEGF, STTA, MA-PC, PPV, and total treatments (mean ± standard deviation) in the year before surgery were 3.0 ± 1.4, 0.1 ± 0.3, 0.8 ± 1.0, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 4.0 ± 2.1, respectively. …”