Candidates from the RF method. The top 25 random forest candidates ranked by mean decrease in accuracy and mean decrease in Gini Index are in the first and second columns, respectively.... by Zoë Parker Cates (22184243)

“…The top 25 random forest candidates ranked by mean decrease in accuracy and mean decrease in Gini Index are in the first and second columns, respectively. …”

Heteroscedastic linear mixed model main results, estimating the volume (ml) of beer sold per day on the transformed (cube root) scale, on the original scale and on the relative sca... by Eleni Mantzari (6991172)

Subjects:

Intraoperative facial and intraoral photographs of the case with mandibular third molar extraction. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

Third. by Cuicui Liu (1496260)

Posttreatment facial, intraoral photographs, and radiographs of the case with mandibular third molar extraction. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

Pretreatment facial, intraoral photographs, and radiographs of the case with mandibular third molar extraction. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

Mean 0-30 m sprint times for TSG, VBT, and CG groups at pre-test and post-test (with 95% CI). by Murat Tutar (22250461)

Subjects:

Mean 0-20 m sprint times for TSG, VBT, and CG groups at pre-test and post-test (with 95% CI). by Murat Tutar (22250461)

Subjects:

Mean 0-10 m sprint times for TSG, VBT, and CG groups at pre-test and post-test (with 95% CI). by Murat Tutar (22250461)

Subjects:

Flow of premises through the study. by Eleni Mantzari (6991172)

Subjects:

Superimposition of the cephalometric tracings obtained before and after treatment of case with mandibular third molar extraction. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

Comparison of pretreatment cephalometric variables between premolar extraction and mandibular third molar extraction groups. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

Comparison of upper and lower arch crowding between premolar extraction group and the mandibular third molar extraction groups. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

Time course of central retinal thickness (CRT) in recurrence and non-recurrence groups. by Yasuyuki Sotani (20114144)

“…These values significantly decreased in the first postoperative year to 2.3 ± 2.6, 0.1 ± 0.3, 0.8 ± 1.6, 0, and 3.1 ± 2.8; in the second year to 2.1 ± 2.8, 0.4 ± 1.0, 0.0, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 2.6 ± 2.8; and in the third year to 2.0 ± 2.2, 0, 0.6 ± 1.7, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 2.8 ± 3.5 (Kruskal–Wallis test, p < 0.001; <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0332941#pone.0332941.g007" target="_blank">Fig 7</a>). …”

Annual treatment frequencies in recurrence and non-recurrence groups. by Yasuyuki Sotani (20114144)

“…<p>In the recurrence group, the respective treatment counts for anti-VEGF, STTA, MA-PC, PPV, and total treatments (mean ± standard deviation) in the year before surgery were 3.0 ± 1.4, 0.1 ± 0.3, 0.8 ± 1.0, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 4.0 ± 2.1, respectively. …”

Fluctuation trend of the mean temperature index. by Chengyuan Hao (21615653)

“…Thirdly, the relevant e high temperature indices of plain urban area were larger while the relevant low temperature indices of mountain hilly area were smaller. …”

Variation curve of the mean temperature index. by Chengyuan Hao (21615653)

“…Thirdly, the relevant e high temperature indices of plain urban area were larger while the relevant low temperature indices of mountain hilly area were smaller. …”

Mann-Kendall test for the mean temperature index. by Chengyuan Hao (21615653)

“…Thirdly, the relevant e high temperature indices of plain urban area were larger while the relevant low temperature indices of mountain hilly area were smaller. …”

Comparison of treatment effects between premolar extraction and mandibular third molar extraction groups. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

Fig-14 Data. by Feng Wang (44414)