Standardized factor loadings for OUS-DE in the CFA (N = 378). by Aistė Ambrasė (22505574)

Subjects:

Candidates from the RF method. The top 25 random forest candidates ranked by mean decrease in accuracy and mean decrease in Gini Index are in the first and second columns, respectively.... by Zoë Parker Cates (22184243)

“…The top 25 random forest candidates ranked by mean decrease in accuracy and mean decrease in Gini Index are in the first and second columns, respectively. …”

DataSheet1_Decreasing viscosity and increasing accessible load by replacing classical diluents with a hydrotrope in liquid–liquid extraction.docx by Asmae El Maangar (19690522)

“…We show that using hydrotropes as a diluent decreases the viscosity of solutions by more than a factor of ten, even under high load by extracted cations. …”

Factors associated with AL score (multivariable regression analyses for the third follow-up). by Eric Priedemann (21175492)

Subjects:

Intraoperative facial and intraoral photographs of the case with mandibular third molar extraction. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

Third. by Cuicui Liu (1496260)

Posttreatment facial, intraoral photographs, and radiographs of the case with mandibular third molar extraction. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

Pretreatment facial, intraoral photographs, and radiographs of the case with mandibular third molar extraction. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

Mean 0-30 m sprint times for TSG, VBT, and CG groups at pre-test and post-test (with 95% CI). by Murat Tutar (22250461)

Subjects:

Mean 0-20 m sprint times for TSG, VBT, and CG groups at pre-test and post-test (with 95% CI). by Murat Tutar (22250461)

Subjects:

Mean 0-10 m sprint times for TSG, VBT, and CG groups at pre-test and post-test (with 95% CI). by Murat Tutar (22250461)

Subjects:

Superimposition of the cephalometric tracings obtained before and after treatment of case with mandibular third molar extraction. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

Comparison of pretreatment cephalometric variables between premolar extraction and mandibular third molar extraction groups. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

Effect sizes (if > 0.5) for the comparison of increasing load vs. decreasing load for the multifidus muscle. by Christoph Anders (4068499)

Subjects:

Effect sizes (if > 0.5) for the comparison of increasing load vs. decreasing load for the longissimus muscle. by Christoph Anders (4068499)

Subjects:

The motor torque curves of load increase/decrease (A) the load of 10 N • m (B) the load of 20 N • m. by Taochang Li (20642935)

“…<p>The motor torque curves of load increase/decrease (A) the load of 10 N • m (B) the load of 20 N • m.…”

The motor speed curves of load increase/decrease (A) the load of 10 N • m (B) the load of 20 N • m. by Taochang Li (20642935)

“…<p>The motor speed curves of load increase/decrease (A) the load of 10 N • m (B) the load of 20 N • m.…”

AL scores at baseline and follow-ups. by Eric Priedemann (21175492)

Subjects:

Effect sizes (if > 0.5) for the comparison of increasing load vs. decreasing load for the rectus abdominis muscle. by Christoph Anders (4068499)

Subjects:

Effect sizes (if > 0.5) for the comparison of increasing load vs. decreasing load for the internal oblique muscle. by Christoph Anders (4068499)

Subjects: