Intraoperative facial and intraoral photographs of the case with mandibular third molar extraction. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

Posttreatment facial, intraoral photographs, and radiographs of the case with mandibular third molar extraction. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

Pretreatment facial, intraoral photographs, and radiographs of the case with mandibular third molar extraction. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

Superimposition of the cephalometric tracings obtained before and after treatment of case with mandibular third molar extraction. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

Comparison of pretreatment cephalometric variables between premolar extraction and mandibular third molar extraction groups. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

Annual treatment frequencies in recurrence and non-recurrence groups. by Yasuyuki Sotani (20114144)

“…These significantly decreased to 2.3 ± 2.6, 0.1 ± 0.3, 0.8 ± 1.6, 0.0, and 3.1 ± 2.8 in the first year; 2.1 ± 2.8, 0.4 ± 1.0, 0, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 2.6 ± 2.8 in the second year; and 2.0 ± 2.2, 0, 0.6 ± 1.7, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 2.8 ± 3.5 in the third year (Kruskal–Wallis test, p < 0.001; Dunn’s test, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01). …”

Comparison of upper and lower arch crowding between premolar extraction group and the mandibular third molar extraction groups. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

Time course of central retinal thickness (CRT) in recurrence and non-recurrence groups. by Yasuyuki Sotani (20114144)

“…These values significantly decreased in the first postoperative year to 2.3 ± 2.6, 0.1 ± 0.3, 0.8 ± 1.6, 0, and 3.1 ± 2.8; in the second year to 2.1 ± 2.8, 0.4 ± 1.0, 0.0, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 2.6 ± 2.8; and in the third year to 2.0 ± 2.2, 0, 0.6 ± 1.7, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 2.8 ± 3.5 (Kruskal–Wallis test, p < 0.001; <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0332941#pone.0332941.g007" target="_blank">Fig 7</a>). …”

Comparison of treatment effects between premolar extraction and mandibular third molar extraction groups. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

Individual and mean EQ-5D VAS scores in the PP-group (0 = baseline, 1 = after the first day of treatment, 2 = after the second day of treatment, 3 = after the third day of treatmen... by Marcus Persson (20496333)

Characteristics of the included trials (n = 17). by Xiaojuan Yang (794374)

Subjects:

Candidates from the RF method. The top 25 random forest candidates ranked by mean decrease in accuracy and mean decrease in Gini Index are in the first and second columns, respectively.... by Zoë Parker Cates (22184243)

“…The top 25 random forest candidates ranked by mean decrease in accuracy and mean decrease in Gini Index are in the first and second columns, respectively. …”

Fluctuation trend of the mean temperature index. by Chengyuan Hao (21615653)

“…Thirdly, the relevant e high temperature indices of plain urban area were larger while the relevant low temperature indices of mountain hilly area were smaller. …”

Variation curve of the mean temperature index. by Chengyuan Hao (21615653)

“…Thirdly, the relevant e high temperature indices of plain urban area were larger while the relevant low temperature indices of mountain hilly area were smaller. …”

Mean 0-30 m sprint times for TSG, VBT, and CG groups at pre-test and post-test (with 95% CI). by Murat Tutar (22250461)

Mean 0-20 m sprint times for TSG, VBT, and CG groups at pre-test and post-test (with 95% CI). by Murat Tutar (22250461)

Mean 0-10 m sprint times for TSG, VBT, and CG groups at pre-test and post-test (with 95% CI). by Murat Tutar (22250461)

Top: Individual Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores in the PP-group. by Marcus Persson (20496333)

Mann-Kendall test for the mean temperature index. by Chengyuan Hao (21615653)

“…Thirdly, the relevant e high temperature indices of plain urban area were larger while the relevant low temperature indices of mountain hilly area were smaller. …”

Phylogenetic distance between partial pol-wgs mixtures and nFL genome for subset dataset. by August Guang (9975678)