Search alternatives:
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search)
auc decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), awd decreased (Expand Search), ash decreased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search)
auc decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), awd decreased (Expand Search), ash decreased (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
Statistical analysis of the AUC measurement.
Published 2025“…<p>Analysis indicated that INSv application significantly changed spontaneous calcium activity (IAsp <i>p</i>-value: 0.1290, INSv <i>p</i>-value: 0.0002). The mean AUC decreased in both samples.</p> <p>(TIF)</p>…”
-
11
-
12
-
13
ROC curve and AUC value of all models.
Published 2024“…As for Specificity (82.94%) and ROC-AUC (82.13%), the Multilayer Perceptron with SGD optimizer obtained the highest scores. …”
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
AUC statistics comparing statistical trends in control and test populations.
Published 2025“…<p>To evaluate statistical trends, we calculated Kendall’s rank correlation coefficient during the pre-critical interval (here, days one to sixty), and compared control (constant temperature, non-epidemic) and warming (warming treatment, epidemic emergence) coefficients across simulations and experimental populations by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) statistic. Values less than 0.5 suggest that a decrease in the statistical metric indicates emergence, while values greater than 0.5 suggest that an increase in the statistical metric indicates emergence, with more extreme values indicating stronger trends. …”
-
19
-
20
Comparative Internal and External AUC Performance Across Single-Site Models.
Published 2025“…At Agincourt, the internal AUC is 0.96 (interquartile range (IQR) 0.95–0.97), while the external AUC is 0.88 (IQR 0.86–0.88), demonstrating a statistically significant difference with a decrease of approximately 0.08 in performance when models are externally validated. …”