Candidates from the RF method. The top 25 random forest candidates ranked by mean decrease in accuracy and mean decrease in Gini Index are in the first and second columns, respectively.... by Zoë Parker Cates (22184243)

“…The top 25 random forest candidates ranked by mean decrease in accuracy and mean decrease in Gini Index are in the first and second columns, respectively. …”

Mean 0-30 m sprint times for TSG, VBT, and CG groups at pre-test and post-test (with 95% CI). by Murat Tutar (22250461)

Mean 0-20 m sprint times for TSG, VBT, and CG groups at pre-test and post-test (with 95% CI). by Murat Tutar (22250461)

Mean 0-10 m sprint times for TSG, VBT, and CG groups at pre-test and post-test (with 95% CI). by Murat Tutar (22250461)

Team A head impacts by player position. by Rachel S. Watson (21864061)

Intraoperative facial and intraoral photographs of the case with mandibular third molar extraction. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

Time course of central retinal thickness (CRT) in recurrence and non-recurrence groups. by Yasuyuki Sotani (20114144)

“…<p>In the recurrence group, CRT (μm ± standard deviation) significantly decreased from 546.1 ± 117.0 μm preoperatively to 317.1 ± 46.9, 317.8 ± 55.6, 290.8 ± 33.5, 342.9 ± 82.2, 333.0 ± 84.2, and 349.8 ± 76.9 μm at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively (Kruskal-Wallis test, P < 0.001; Dunn’s test, **P < 0.01). …”

Posttreatment facial, intraoral photographs, and radiographs of the case with mandibular third molar extraction. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

Pretreatment facial, intraoral photographs, and radiographs of the case with mandibular third molar extraction. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

Mean responses to the Oxford Utilitarianism Scale and its subscales. by Aistė Ambrasė (22505574)

Subjects:

Total team A match head impacts by header scenario. by Rachel S. Watson (21864061)

Total team A practice head impacts by header scenario. by Rachel S. Watson (21864061)

Superimposition of the cephalometric tracings obtained before and after treatment of case with mandibular third molar extraction. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

Comparison of pretreatment cephalometric variables between premolar extraction and mandibular third molar extraction groups. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

Comparison of upper and lower arch crowding between premolar extraction group and the mandibular third molar extraction groups. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

Project summary: Team Based Learning tutorials in S248 by Kate Nixon (18466555)

“…The project will implement some elements of the team-based learning (TBL) approach¹ to deliver tutorials with a greater student focus and an emphasis on building working relationships with members of a team. …”

Differences in mean number of papers (top) and co-authors (bottom) depending on (1) NI membership and (2) time joined NI. by William C. Barley (8915282)

Subjects:

Regression estimates and incidence rate ratios from GLMER for number of papers (top) and coauthors (bottom). by William C. Barley (8915282)

Subjects:

Individual and mean EQ-5D VAS scores in the PP-group (0 = baseline, 1 = after the first day of treatment, 2 = after the second day of treatment, 3 = after the third day of treatmen... by Marcus Persson (20496333)

Comparison of treatment effects between premolar extraction and mandibular third molar extraction groups. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01. by Lijuan Liu (136685)