Search alternatives:
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
age decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), rate decreased (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
age decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), rate decreased (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
Factors associated with AL score (multivariable regression analyses for the third follow-up).
Published 2025Subjects: -
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
Annual treatment frequencies in all eyes.
Published 2025“…<p>The number of anti-VEGF treatments, STTA, MA-PC, PPV, and total treatments (mean ± SD) significantly decreased from 2.6 ± 1.6, 0.3 ± 0.8, 0.6 ± 0.8, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 3.7 ± 1.7 preoperatively to 0.8 ± 1.9, 0.0 ± 0.2, 0.3 ± 1.0, 0.0, and 1.2 ± 2.2; at year 2 to 0.7 ± 2.0, 0.1 ± 0.6, 0.0 ± 0.2, 0.0 ± 0.2, and 1.0 ± 2.1; and at year 3 to 0.9 ± 2.2, 0.0, 0.2 ± 1.0, 0.0 ± 0.2, and 1.1 ± 3.1 (Kruskal–Wallis test, P < 0.001; Dunn’s test, **P < 0.01). …”
-
8
Annual number of outpatient visits in all eyes.
Published 2025“…<p>Mean visit frequency (mean ± standard deviation) significantly decreased from 11.5 ± 4.3 preoperatively to 8.8 ± 4.1, 5.0 ± 3.4, and 4.4 ± 3.2 visits in the first, second, and third postoperative years, respectively (Kruskal–Wallis test, P < 0.001; Dunn’s test, **P < 0.01). …”
-
9
Time course of central retinal thickness (CRT) in recurrence and non-recurrence groups.
Published 2025“…These values significantly decreased in the first postoperative year to 2.3 ± 2.6, 0.1 ± 0.3, 0.8 ± 1.6, 0, and 3.1 ± 2.8; in the second year to 2.1 ± 2.8, 0.4 ± 1.0, 0.0, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 2.6 ± 2.8; and in the third year to 2.0 ± 2.2, 0, 0.6 ± 1.7, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 2.8 ± 3.5 (Kruskal–Wallis test, p < 0.001; <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0332941#pone.0332941.g007" target="_blank">Fig 7</a>). …”
-
10
Annual treatment frequencies in recurrence and non-recurrence groups.
Published 2025“…These significantly decreased to 2.3 ± 2.6, 0.1 ± 0.3, 0.8 ± 1.6, 0.0, and 3.1 ± 2.8 in the first year; 2.1 ± 2.8, 0.4 ± 1.0, 0, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 2.6 ± 2.8 in the second year; and 2.0 ± 2.2, 0, 0.6 ± 1.7, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 2.8 ± 3.5 in the third year (Kruskal–Wallis test, p < 0.001; Dunn’s test, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01). …”
-
11
-
12
Biases in larger populations.
Published 2025“…<p>(<b>A</b>) Maximum absolute bias vs the number of neurons in the population for the Bayesian decoder. …”
-
13
-
14
Candidates from the RF method. The top 25 random forest candidates ranked by mean decrease in accuracy and mean decrease in Gini Index are in the first and second columns, respectively....
Published 2025“…The top 25 random forest candidates ranked by mean decrease in accuracy and mean decrease in Gini Index are in the first and second columns, respectively. …”
-
15
-
16
-
17
<b>Supporting data for manuscript</b> "<b>Voluntary locomotion induces an early and remote hemodynamic decrease in the large cerebral veins</b>"
Published 2025“…The locomotion values (traces and metrics) are in arbitrary units with larger integers representing a greater displacement of the spherical treadmill, the hemodynamic (Hbt) values (traces and metrics) are a percentage change from the normalised baseline (prior to stimulus presentation), and the corresponding time series vector is presented in seconds. …”
-
18
Study-related adverse events.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
19
Study flow chart.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
20
Study CONSORT diagram.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”