Candidates from the RF method. The top 25 random forest candidates ranked by mean decrease in accuracy and mean decrease in Gini Index are in the first and second columns, respectively.... by Zoë Parker Cates (22184243)

“…The top 25 random forest candidates ranked by mean decrease in accuracy and mean decrease in Gini Index are in the first and second columns, respectively. …”

Intraoperative facial and intraoral photographs of the case with mandibular third molar extraction. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

Subjects:

Third. by Cuicui Liu (1496260)

Posttreatment facial, intraoral photographs, and radiographs of the case with mandibular third molar extraction. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

Subjects:

Pretreatment facial, intraoral photographs, and radiographs of the case with mandibular third molar extraction. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

Subjects:

Mean 0-30 m sprint times for TSG, VBT, and CG groups at pre-test and post-test (with 95% CI). by Murat Tutar (22250461)

Subjects:

Mean 0-20 m sprint times for TSG, VBT, and CG groups at pre-test and post-test (with 95% CI). by Murat Tutar (22250461)

Subjects:

Mean 0-10 m sprint times for TSG, VBT, and CG groups at pre-test and post-test (with 95% CI). by Murat Tutar (22250461)

Subjects:

Superimposition of the cephalometric tracings obtained before and after treatment of case with mandibular third molar extraction. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

Subjects:

Comparison of pretreatment cephalometric variables between premolar extraction and mandibular third molar extraction groups. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

Subjects:

Comparison of upper and lower arch crowding between premolar extraction group and the mandibular third molar extraction groups. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

Subjects:

Annual treatment frequencies in all eyes. by Yasuyuki Sotani (20114144)

“…<p>The number of anti-VEGF treatments, STTA, MA-PC, PPV, and total treatments (mean ± SD) significantly decreased from 2.6 ± 1.6, 0.3 ± 0.8, 0.6 ± 0.8, 0.1 ± 0.3, and 3.7 ± 1.7 preoperatively to 0.8 ± 1.9, 0.0 ± 0.2, 0.3 ± 1.0, 0.0, and 1.2 ± 2.2; at year 2 to 0.7 ± 2.0, 0.1 ± 0.6, 0.0 ± 0.2, 0.0 ± 0.2, and 1.0 ± 2.1; and at year 3 to 0.9 ± 2.2, 0.0, 0.2 ± 1.0, 0.0 ± 0.2, and 1.1 ± 3.1 (Kruskal–Wallis test, P < 0.001; Dunn’s test, **P < 0.01). …”

Individual and mean EQ-5D VAS scores in the PP-group (0 = baseline, 1 = after the first day of treatment, 2 = after the second day of treatment, 3 = after the third day of treatmen... by Marcus Persson (20496333)

Comparison of treatment effects between premolar extraction and mandibular third molar extraction groups. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01. by Lijuan Liu (136685)

Subjects:

Dynamics of net spillage in the third stage (post epidemic). by Cuicui Liu (1496260)

Mean responses to the Oxford Utilitarianism Scale and its subscales. by Aistė Ambrasė (22505574)

Subjects:

Amplitude for A/L = 0.02. by Muhammad Hammad Bucha (21736111)

Changes in total spillage during the third stage (post epidemic). by Cuicui Liu (1496260)

Experimental data. by Tainá Neves Ferreira (21601579)

Subjects:

Quantification of ingested proteins by females after 30 minutes of blood feeding. by Tainá Neves Ferreira (21601579)

Subjects: